Department of Oral, Craniomaxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Goethe University Medical Center Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):807-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 Apr 7.
To compare treatment outcomes, handling and long term results between two osseo-fixation systems for mandibular angle fractures - the external oblique ridge (external oblique) plate and the grid plate.
Sixty patients with mandibular angle fracture were analyzed regarding their operative treatment: 30 patients were treated with an external oblique plate and compared to 30 patients treated with a grid plate on the vestibular cortex. The follow up period was at least 1 year for both groups and the following complications were noted: infection, abnormality in fracture healing, nonunion, pain, hypoaesthesia and dysocclusion.
The overall average operation time (from intubation to extubation) was 102.1 min (± 44.1 min). Single sided fractures treated with the grid plate needed in average 81.07 min (± 37.9 min) of operation time while single sided fractures treated with the external oblique plate needed 89.3 min (± 42.2 min). In multiple mandibular fractures, no significant change in the operation time between either plating system was found (118.8 ± 35.2 min). After the follow up period fracture healing was considered clinically complete in all patients, but complications occurred significantly more often in the external oblique group (13.3%; N=8) than in the grid plate group (0%; N=0).
Isolated mandibular angle fractures can be more effectively treated using grid plates than using other osteosynthesis techniques. It is an easy to use alternative to conventional miniplate systems with good clinical outcome and fewer complications. An angulated burr and screwdriver has to be used to put on the plate laterally.
比较两种下颌角骨折内固定系统(外斜线钢板和网格钢板)的治疗效果、处理方法和长期结果。
分析了 60 例下颌角骨折患者的手术治疗情况:30 例患者采用外斜线钢板治疗,与 30 例采用网格钢板治疗的患者进行比较。两组患者的随访时间均至少为 1 年,并记录了以下并发症:感染、骨折愈合异常、骨不连、疼痛、感觉迟钝和咬合不正。
总体平均手术时间(从插管到拔管)为 102.1 分钟(±44.1 分钟)。单侧骨折采用网格钢板治疗的平均手术时间为 81.07 分钟(±37.9 分钟),而单侧骨折采用外斜线钢板治疗的平均手术时间为 89.3 分钟(±42.2 分钟)。在多发性下颌骨骨折中,两种钢板系统的手术时间无显著差异(118.8±35.2 分钟)。随访期后,所有患者的骨折愈合均被认为是临床完全的,但外斜线组并发症发生率明显高于网格钢板组(13.3%,N=8)。
对于孤立的下颌角骨折,网格钢板的治疗效果优于其他骨愈合技术。它是一种易于使用的替代传统微型板系统的方法,具有良好的临床效果和较少的并发症。需要使用角度磨头和螺丝刀将其侧向安装在钢板上。