Suppr超能文献

客观边界法(OBM):一种基于概率的模型,用于在医学项目评估中设置客观的及格/不及格截止分数。

The Objective Borderline method (OBM): a probability-based model for setting up an objective pass/fail cut-off score in medical programme assessments.

机构信息

Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 May;18(2):231-44. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9367-y. Epub 2012 Apr 7.

Abstract

The decision to pass or fail a medical student is a 'high stakes' one. The aim of this study is to introduce and demonstrate the feasibility and practicality of a new objective standard-setting method for determining the pass/fail cut-off score from borderline grades. Three methods for setting up pass/fail cut-off scores were compared: the Regression Method, the Borderline Group Method, and the new Objective Borderline Method (OBM). Using Year 5 students' OSCE results from one medical school we established the pass/fail cut-off scores by the abovementioned three methods. The comparison indicated that the pass/fail cut-off scores generated by the OBM were similar to those generated by the more established methods (0.840 ≤ r ≤ 0.998; p < .0001). Based on theoretical and empirical analysis, we suggest that the OBM has advantages over existing methods in that it combines objectivity, realism, robust empirical basis and, no less importantly, is simple to use.

摘要

判定医学生的及格/不及格是一个“高风险”的决定。本研究旨在介绍和展示一种新的客观标准设定方法的可行性和实用性,该方法用于确定边界成绩的及格/不及格的截止分数。比较了三种设定及格/不及格截止分数的方法:回归法、边界组法和新的客观边界法(OBM)。使用一所医学院五年级学生的 OSCE 成绩,我们通过上述三种方法确定了及格/不及格的截止分数。比较表明,OBM 生成的及格/不及格截止分数与更成熟的方法生成的分数相似(0.840 ≤ r ≤ 0.998;p <.0001)。基于理论和实证分析,我们建议 OBM 具有优于现有方法的优势,因为它结合了客观性、现实性、强大的经验基础,同样重要的是,它易于使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验