Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Int Endod J. 2012 Sep;45(9):840-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02041.x. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
To investigate ex vivo the influence of the post system on fracture resistance and failure mode of root filled incisor, canine, premolar and molar teeth.
Eighty human teeth were divided into eight groups (n = 10) resulting from the interaction between the two study factors: post system (glass fibre post; cast Ni-Cr alloy post and core) and type of tooth (maxillary incisors, maxillary canines, maxillary premolars and mandibular molars). All roots were prepared with a 2-mm ferrule and restored with metal crown. Fracture resistance (N) was assessed in a mechanical testing device, and the data were analysed by two-way anova (4 × 2) followed by Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The failure mode was evaluated using an optical stereomicroscope and classified according to the location of the failure. Failure mode data were analysed by two-factor anova and Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) tests (α = 0.05). Correlation between fracture resistance and failure mode was analysed by linear regression.
Glass fibre and cast posts and cores had similar fracture resistance, regardless of the type of tooth. Canines and molars had significantly higher fracture resistance (P < 0.001) than premolars. Incisors teeth had significantly lower fracture resistance (P < 0.001) than premolars. The fracture mode for incisors, premolars and molars was more amenable to restoration when the teeth were restored with glass fibre posts. Fracture resistance had no correlation with fracture mode, regardless of the post system and type of tooth analysed.
Post system had no significant effect on fracture resistance, regardless of the type of tooth. The mode of fracture was more restorable with glass fibre posts.
体外研究不同桩核系统对已根管治疗的切牙、尖牙、前磨牙和磨牙的抗折能力和破坏模式的影响。
80 颗人离体牙随机分为 8 组(n=10),根据两种研究因素(桩核系统[玻璃纤维桩、铸造镍铬合金桩核]和牙齿类型[上颌切牙、上颌尖牙、上颌前磨牙和下颌磨牙])的相互作用进行分组。所有根管制备成 2mm 的颈圈并用金属冠修复。在机械测试装置上评估抗折能力(N),采用双因素方差分析(4×2)对数据进行分析,然后采用 Tukey 检验(α=0.05)进行两两比较。采用光学立体显微镜评估破坏模式,并根据破坏位置进行分类。采用双因素方差分析和 Student-Newman-Keuls(SNK)检验(α=0.05)对破坏模式数据进行分析。采用线性回归分析抗折能力与破坏模式之间的相关性。
玻璃纤维桩和铸造桩核的抗折能力相似,与牙齿类型无关。尖牙和磨牙的抗折能力显著高于前磨牙(P<0.001)。切牙的抗折能力显著低于前磨牙(P<0.001)。对于切牙、前磨牙和磨牙,用玻璃纤维桩修复时,破坏模式更有利于修复。无论分析的桩核系统和牙齿类型如何,抗折能力与破坏模式均无相关性。
桩核系统对不同类型牙齿的抗折能力均无显著影响。玻璃纤维桩的破坏模式更有利于修复。