Gastroenterology Division, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9, Fuku-ura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.
Pancreatology. 2012 Mar-Apr;12(2):141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
The preoperative diagnosis of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas can be very difficult, since low-risk and high-risk lesions can be difficult to differentiate even after cytological analysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the preoperative diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in differentiating low-risk and high-risk IPMNs.
We retrospectively identified 36 patients who underwent preoperative EUS for branch duct IPMNs. The pathological diagnosis after surgical resection was low-grade dysplasia (n = 26), moderate dysplasia (n = 1), high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (n = 5), and invasive carcinoma (n = 4). We divided the patients into two groups: low risk (low-grade dysplasia or moderate dysplasia) and high risk (high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma). We focused on the diameter of the cystic dilated branch duct, the main pancreatic duct, and the mural nodule as measured using the EUS findings.
The cystic dilated branch duct diameter (31.5 mm vs. 41.9 mm, P = 0.0225) was significantly correlated with low-risk and high-risk IPMNs, but the main pancreatic duct diameter (5.37 mm vs. 5.44 mm, P = 0.9418) was not significantly correlated with the low-risk and high-risk IPMNs. The mural nodule diameter of the papillary protrusions (4.3 mm vs. 16.4 mm, P < 0.0001) and the width diameter of the mural nodule (5.7 mm vs. 23.2 mm, P < 0.0001) were significantly correlated with low-risk and high-risk IPMNs.
The mural nodule of papillary protrusions diameter and width diameter observed using EUS was a reliable preoperative diagnostic finding capable of distinguishing low-risk and high-risk IPMNs.
胰腺分支胆管导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)术前诊断非常困难,因为即使经过细胞学分析,低危和高危病变也难以区分。本研究旨在评估内镜超声(EUS)在区分低危和高危 IPMN 中的术前诊断价值。
我们回顾性地确定了 36 例接受术前 EUS 检查的分支胆管 IPMN 患者。手术切除后的病理诊断为低级别异型增生(n = 26)、中级别异型增生(n = 1)、高级别异型增生或原位癌(n = 5)和浸润性癌(n = 4)。我们将患者分为两组:低危(低级别异型增生或中级别异型增生)和高危(高级别异型增生或原位癌)。我们重点关注 EUS 检查结果中测量的囊性扩张分支胆管、主胰管和壁结节的直径。
囊性扩张分支胆管直径(31.5 毫米比 41.9 毫米,P = 0.0225)与低危和高危 IPMN 显著相关,但主胰管直径(5.37 毫米比 5.44 毫米,P = 0.9418)与低危和高危 IPMN 不显著相关。乳头状突起的壁结节直径(4.3 毫米比 16.4 毫米,P < 0.0001)和壁结节的宽度直径(5.7 毫米比 23.2 毫米,P < 0.0001)与低危和高危 IPMN 显著相关。
EUS 观察到的乳头状突起的壁结节直径和宽度直径是一种可靠的术前诊断发现,能够区分低危和高危 IPMN。