Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, Avda. Ramón y Cajal s/n, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Br J Pharmacol. 2012 Sep;167(1):183-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01981.x.
Impulsivity is a core symptom in many neuropsychiatric disorders. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of topiramate and pregabalin on the modulation of different impulsivity dimensions in DBA/2 mice.
The effects of acute and chronic administration of pregabalin (10, 20 and 40 mg·kg(-1) ) and topiramate (12.5, 25 and 50 mg·kg(-1) ) were evaluated in the light-dark box (LDB), hole board test (HBT) and delayed reinforcement task (DRT). α(2A) -Adrenoceptor, D(2) -receptor and TH gene expression were evaluated by real-time PCR in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), accumbens (ACC) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), respectively.
Acute pregabalin administration showed a clear anxiolytic-like effect (LDB) but did not modify novelty-seeking behaviour (HBT). In contrast, topiramate produced an anxiolytic effect only at the highest dose, whereas it reduced novelty seeking at all doses tested. In the DRT, acute pregabalin had no effect, whereas topiramate only reduced motor impulsivity. Chronically, pregabalin significantly increased motor impulsivity and topiramate diminished cognitive impulsivity. Pregabalin decreased α(2A) -adrenoceptor and D(2) -receptor gene expression in the PFC and ACC, respectively, and increased TH in the VTA. In contrast, chronic administration of topiramate increased α(2A) -adrenoceptor and D(2) -receptor gene expression in the PFC and ACC, respectively, and also increased TH in the VTA.
These results suggest that the usefulness of pregabalin in impulsivity-related disorders is related to its anxiolytic properties, whereas topiramate modulates impulsivity. These differences could be linked to their opposite effects on α(2A) -adrenoceptor and D(2) -receptor gene expression in the PFC and ACC, respectively.
冲动是许多神经精神疾病的核心症状。本研究的主要目的是评估托吡酯和普瑞巴林对 DBA/2 小鼠不同冲动维度的调节作用。
评估了普瑞巴林(10、20 和 40 mg·kg(-1))和托吡酯(12.5、25 和 50 mg·kg(-1))急性和慢性给药对亮暗箱(LDB)、洞板试验(HBT)和延迟强化任务(DRT)的影响。通过实时 PCR 分别评估前额叶皮质(PFC)、伏隔核(ACC)和腹侧被盖区(VTA)中 α(2A) -肾上腺素受体、D(2) -受体和 TH 基因的表达。
普瑞巴林急性给药表现出明显的抗焦虑样作用(LDB),但不改变寻求新奇行为(HBT)。相比之下,托吡酯仅在最高剂量时产生抗焦虑作用,而在所有测试剂量下均减少寻求新奇感。在 DRT 中,普瑞巴林无作用,而托吡酯仅减少运动冲动。慢性给药时,普瑞巴林显著增加运动冲动,托吡酯降低认知冲动。普瑞巴林降低 PFC 和 ACC 中的 α(2A) -肾上腺素受体和 D(2) -受体基因表达,并增加 VTA 中的 TH。相反,托吡酯慢性给药增加 PFC 和 ACC 中的 α(2A) -肾上腺素受体和 D(2) -受体基因表达,同时增加 VTA 中的 TH。
这些结果表明,普瑞巴林在与冲动相关的疾病中的有效性与其抗焦虑特性有关,而托吡酯则调节冲动。这些差异可能与其在 PFC 和 ACC 中对 α(2A) -肾上腺素受体和 D(2) -受体基因表达的相反作用有关。