• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型Angio-Seal Evolution与Angio-Seal STS闭合装置的比较。

Comparison of the novel Angio-Seal Evolution with Angio-Seal STS closure device.

作者信息

Lupi Alessandro, Rognoni Andrea, Secco Gioel G, Lazzero Maurizio, Plebani Laura, Cossa Giuseppe, Reale Danilo, Sansa Mara, Bongo Angelo S, Di Mario Carlo

机构信息

Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy.

出版信息

Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2012 Mar;24(1):28-36. doi: 10.1177/1531003512442091. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1177/1531003512442091
PMID:22491159
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angio-Seal Evolution (ASE) is a novel vascular closure device (VCD) engineered to reduce deployment skills. It is unknown if these changes translated into better clinical results.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Early VCD failure and major and minor vascular complications were prospectively assessed in 584 consecutive patients treated by ASE (ASE group) and in 633 consecutive patients treated by the older Angio-Seal STS (AS-STS group). Early VCD failure was rare (ASE 1.7% vs AS-STS 1.3%, P = .52). Major vascular complication risk was similar (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79-3.90, P = .17), but minor vascular complication rate was significantly higher in the ASE group (OR = 3.36, 95% CI = 1.57-7.21, P = .002). At logistic regression ASE was an independent predictor of vascular complications. Early VCD failure was associated with the highest risk for vascular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large unselected population, ASE-treated patients showed increased risk for minor vascular complications. Early VCD failure negatively affected short-term vascular prognosis.

摘要

背景

Angio-Seal Evolution(ASE)是一种新型血管闭合装置(VCD),旨在降低操作技能要求。目前尚不清楚这些改变是否能转化为更好的临床效果。

方法与结果

前瞻性评估了连续接受ASE治疗的584例患者(ASE组)和连续接受旧款Angio-Seal STS治疗的633例患者(AS-STS组)的早期VCD失败情况以及主要和次要血管并发症。早期VCD失败罕见(ASE组为1.7%,AS-STS组为1.3%,P = 0.52)。主要血管并发症风险相似(优势比[OR]=1.76,95%置信区间[CI]=0.79 - 3.90,P = 0.17),但ASE组的次要血管并发症发生率显著更高(OR = 3.36,95% CI = 1.57 - 7.21,P = 0.002)。在逻辑回归分析中,ASE是血管并发症的独立预测因素。早期VCD失败与血管并发症的最高风险相关。

结论

在一个未经过筛选的大样本人群中,接受ASE治疗的患者出现次要血管并发症的风险增加。早期VCD失败对短期血管预后有负面影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the novel Angio-Seal Evolution with Angio-Seal STS closure device.新型Angio-Seal Evolution与Angio-Seal STS闭合装置的比较。
Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2012 Mar;24(1):28-36. doi: 10.1177/1531003512442091. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
2
Safety and efficacy of the new Angio-Seal Evolution™ closure device: a single-center experience.新型Angio-Seal Evolution™封堵装置的安全性和有效性:单中心经验
J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Apr;23(4):150-5.
3
Safety and effectiveness of a novel vascular closure device: a prospective study of the ExoSeal compared to the Angio-Seal and ProGlide.一种新型血管闭合装置的安全性和有效性:ExoSeal与Angio-Seal和ProGlide的前瞻性对比研究。
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Dec;21(6):822-8. doi: 10.1583/14-4744MR.1.
4
Comparison of closure strategies after balloon aortic valvuloplasty: suture mediated versus collagen based versus manual.球囊主动脉瓣成形术后的闭合策略比较:缝合介导与胶原基与手动。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):119-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22940.
5
Efficacy and safety of antegrade common femoral artery access closure using the Angio-Seal device: experience with 1889 interventions for critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients.经皮顺行股总动脉入路使用 Angio-Seal 装置闭合的疗效和安全性:在 1889 例糖尿病患者严重肢体缺血介入治疗中的应用经验。
J Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;17(3):366-75. doi: 10.1583/09-2960.1.
6
The Angio-Seal Evolution registry: outcomes of a novel automated Angio-Seal vascular closure device.血管封堵器(Angio-Seal)Evolution注册研究:新型自动血管封堵器(Angio-Seal)的应用结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Sep;22(9):420-6.
7
Use of the 8-F angio-seal vascular closure device in large-caliber arteriotomies.在大口径血管切开术中使用 8-F 血管封堵器。
J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Aug;19(4):497-500. doi: 10.1583/12-3881.1.
8
Different spectrum of vascular complications after angio-seal deployment or manual compression.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Mar;24(3):90-6.
9
Angio-seal in antegrade endovascular interventions: technical success and complications in a 55-patient series.血管封堵器在顺行性血管内介入治疗中的应用:55例患者系列的技术成功率及并发症
J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Jun;14(3):382-6. doi: 10.1583/06-2050.1.
10
Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of Angio-Seal, StarClose, and manual compression.心脏导管插入术后股动脉的闭合:Angio-Seal、StarClose与手动压迫的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Mar 1;71(4):518-23. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21429.

引用本文的文献

1
Vascular Closure Devices versus Manual Compression in Cardiac Interventional Procedures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管闭合装置与心脏介入手术中的手动压迫:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2022 Sep 9;2022:8569188. doi: 10.1155/2022/8569188. eCollection 2022.
2
Simplified swift and safe vascular closure device deployment without a local arteriogram: Single center experience in 2074 consecutive patients.无需局部动脉造影即可实现简化、快速且安全的血管闭合装置置入:2074例连续患者的单中心经验
Indian Heart J. 2016 Jul-Aug;68(4):529-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.11.036. Epub 2016 Jan 11.