Science and security. U.S. agencies to start screening biomedical proposals for dual use.
作者信息
Malakoff David
出版信息
Science. 2012 Apr 6;336(6077):21. doi: 10.1126/science.336.6077.21.
PMID:22491834
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Science and security. U.S. agencies to start screening biomedical proposals for dual use.科学与安全。美国各机构将开始对生物医学提案进行两用性审查。
Science. 2012 Apr 6;336(6077):21. doi: 10.1126/science.336.6077.21.
2
Regulating the boundaries of dual-use research.规范两用研究的界限。
Science. 2012 Jun 22;336(6088):1523-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1221285.
3
U.S. science policy. Risky business.美国科学政策。风险业务。
Science. 2004 Oct 8;306(5694):220-1. doi: 10.1126/science.306.5694.220.
4
Select agents. Heightened security or neocolonial science?精选病原体。是加强安保还是新殖民科学？
Science. 2004 Dec 24;306(5705):2177-8. doi: 10.1126/science.306.5705.2177.
5
Science and the stimulus. Science and the stimulus.科学与刺激因素。科学与刺激因素。
Science. 2009 Nov 27;326(5957):1176-7. doi: 10.1126/science.326.5957.1176.
6
Science policy. Caught in the squeeze.科学政策。陷入困境。
Science. 2005 Feb 11;307(5711):832-4. doi: 10.1126/science.307.5711.832a.
7
U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.美国科学预算。科学机构陷入选举后支出紧缩困境。
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1662-3. doi: 10.1126/science.306.5702.1662.
8
U.S. budget. Agencies sweat the details of spending billions more on science.美国预算。各机构为在科学领域多支出数十亿美元的细节而操心。
Science. 2009 Feb 6;323(5915):696-7. doi: 10.1126/science.323.5915.696.
9
U.S. budget 2009. A science budget of choices and chances.2009年美国预算。一个充满选择与机遇的科学预算。
Science. 2008 Feb 8;319(5864):714-5. doi: 10.1126/science.319.5864.714.
10
Science policy. A budget with big winners and losers.科学政策。一个有大赢家和大输家的预算。
Science. 2006 Feb 10;311(5762):762-4. doi: 10.1126/science.311.5762.762.
Zotero 插件