Suppr超能文献

载伊立替康的载药微球(DEBIRI)经动脉内灌注与静脉内治疗(FOLFIRI)用于结直肠癌肝转移:一项 III 期研究的最终结果。

Intra-arterial infusion of irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads (DEBIRI) versus intravenous therapy (FOLFIRI) for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: final results of a phase III study.

机构信息

Department of Oncology-Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2012 Apr;32(4):1387-95.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Metastases to the liver receive most of their blood supply from the arterial route, therefore for patients with hepatic metastases from large bowel cancer, hepatic arterial infusion adopting drug-eluting beads preloaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) may offer a chance of cure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a multi-institutional study, 74 patients were randomly assigned to receive DEBIRI (36) versus systemic irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI, 38). The primary end-point was survival; secondary end points were response, recurrence, toxicity, quality of life, cost and influence of molecular markers.

RESULTS

At 50 months, overall survival was significantly longer for patients treated with DEBIRI than for those treated with FOLFIRI (p=0.031, log-rank). Median survival was 22 (95% Confidence Interval CI=21-23) months, for DEBIRI and 15 (95% CI=12-18) months for FOLFIRI. Progression-free survival was 7 (95% CI=3-11) months in the DEBIRI group compared to 4 (95% CI=3-5) months in the FOLFIRI group and the difference between groups was statistically significant (p=0.006, log-rank). Extrahepatic progression had occurred in all patients by the end of the study, at a median time of 13 (95% CI=10-16) months in the DEBIRI group compared to 9 (95% CI 5-13) months in the FOLFIRI group. A statistically significant difference between groups was not observed (p=0.064, log-rank).The median time for duration of improvement to quality of life was 8 (95% CI=3-13) months in the DEBIRI group and 3 (95% CI=2-4) months in the FOLFIRI group. The difference in duration of improvement was statistically significant (p=0.00002, log-rank).

CONCLUSION

This study showed a statistically significant difference between DEBIRI and FOLFIRI for overall survival (7 months), progression-free survival (3 months) and quality of life (5 months). In addition, a clinically significant improvement in time to extrahepatic progression (4 months) was observed for DEBIRI, a reversal of the expectation for a regional treatment. This suggests a benefit of DEBIRI treatment over standard chemotherapy and serves to establish the expected difference between these two treatment options for planning future large randomized studies.

摘要

背景

肝转移病灶主要通过动脉途径获得血液供应,因此对于结直肠癌肝转移患者,采用载有伊立替康的药物洗脱微球(DEBIRI)进行肝动脉灌注可能有治愈的机会。

患者和方法

在一项多中心研究中,74 名患者被随机分配接受 DEBIRI(36 名)或全身伊立替康、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸(FOLFIRI,38 名)治疗。主要终点是生存;次要终点是反应、复发、毒性、生活质量、成本和分子标志物的影响。

结果

在 50 个月时,接受 DEBIRI 治疗的患者的总生存率明显长于接受 FOLFIRI 治疗的患者(p=0.031,对数秩检验)。中位生存期为 22 个月(95%置信区间 CI=21-23),DEBIRI 组为 15 个月(95% CI=12-18),FOLFIRI 组为 15 个月。DEBIRI 组无进展生存期为 7 个月(95% CI=3-11),FOLFIRI 组为 4 个月(95% CI=3-5),两组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.006,对数秩检验)。在研究结束时,所有患者均出现肝外进展,DEBIRI 组中位时间为 13 个月(95% CI=10-16),FOLFIRI 组为 9 个月(95% CI 5-13)。两组间无统计学差异(p=0.064,对数秩检验)。DEBIRI 组改善生活质量的中位时间为 8 个月(95% CI=3-13),FOLFIRI 组为 3 个月(95% CI=2-4)。改善持续时间的差异有统计学意义(p=0.00002,对数秩检验)。

结论

本研究显示,DEBIRI 与 FOLFIRI 在总生存率(7 个月)、无进展生存率(3 个月)和生活质量(5 个月)方面存在统计学差异。此外,DEBIRI 还观察到肝外进展时间(4 个月)有临床意义的改善,这扭转了对区域治疗的预期。这表明 DEBIRI 治疗优于标准化疗,并为未来大型随机研究规划这两种治疗方案之间的预期差异提供了依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验