Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky.
James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, Kentucky.
Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;121(20):3649-58. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29534. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
Reports have demonstrated the superior activity of combining both irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) therapy. An option for gaining similar benefits with less toxicity would be the administration of irinotecan through a hepatic artery approach. The aim of this study was to assess the response and adverse event rates for irinotecan drug-eluting beads (DEBIRI) with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastasis.
Patients with colorectal liver metastases were randomly assigned to modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) and bevacizumab or mFOLFOX6, bevacizumab, and DEBIRI (FOLFOX-DEBIRI). The primary endpoint was the response rate. The secondary endpoints were adverse events, the rate of conversion to resection, and progression-free survival.
The intention-to-treat population comprised 70 patients: 10 patients in the pilot and then 30 patients randomly assigned to the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm and 30 patients randomly assigned to the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm. The 2 groups were similar with respect to the extent of liver involvement (30% vs 30%), but a greater percentage of patients in the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or 2 (57% vs 31%) and extrahepatic disease (56% vs 32%, P = .02). The median numbers of chemotherapy cycles were similar (10 vs 9), and there were similar rates of grade 3/4 adverse events (54% for the FOLFOX-DEBIRI group vs 46% for the FOLFOX/bevacizumab group). The overall response rate was significantly greater in the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm versus the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm at 2 (78% vs 54%, P = .02), 4 (95% vs 70%, P = .03), and 6 months (76% vs 60%, P = .05). There was significantly more downsizing to resection in the FOLFOX-DEBIRI arm versus the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm (35% vs 16%, P = .05), and there was improved median progression-free survival (15.3 vs 7.6 months).
The simultaneous administration of mFOLFOX6 (with or without bevacizumab) and DEBIRI through the hepatic artery (FOLFOX-DEBIRI) is safe and does not cause treatment delays or increase the systemic toxicity of chemotherapy. This strategy leads to improved overall response rates, improved hepatic progression-free survival, and more durable overall progression-free survival in patients downsized to resection.
有报道表明,联合应用伊立替康和奥沙利铂(FOLFOXIRI)疗法具有更高的活性。一种毒性更小但能获得类似益处的选择是通过肝动脉途径给予伊立替康。本研究的目的是评估伊立替康载药微球(DEBIRI)联合亚叶酸、5-氟尿嘧啶和奥沙利铂(FOLFOX)及贝伐珠单抗作为不可切除结直肠癌肝转移一线治疗的反应率和不良事件发生率。
患有结直肠癌肝转移的患者被随机分配至改良 FOLFOX(mFOLFOX)和贝伐珠单抗或 mFOLFOX6、贝伐珠单抗和 DEBIRI(FOLFOX-DEBIRI)组。主要终点为缓解率。次要终点为不良事件、转化为切除术的比率和无进展生存期。
意向治疗人群包括 70 例患者:10 例为先导期患者,然后随机分为 FOLFOX-DEBIRI 组 30 例和 FOLFOX/贝伐珠单抗组 30 例。两组在肝受累程度(30%比 30%)方面相似,但 FOLFOX-DEBIRI 组有更高比例的患者东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为 1 或 2 级(57%比 31%)和肝外疾病(56%比 32%,P=0.02)。化疗周期中位数相似(10 个周期比 9 个周期),3/4 级不良事件发生率相似(FOLFOX-DEBIRI 组 54%,FOLFOX/贝伐珠单抗组 46%)。FOLFOX-DEBIRI 组的总缓解率显著高于 FOLFOX/贝伐珠单抗组,分别为 2 个月时(78%比 54%,P=0.02)、4 个月时(95%比 70%,P=0.03)和 6 个月时(76%比 60%,P=0.05)。FOLFOX-DEBIRI 组有更多的肿瘤缩小到可切除的患者(35%比 16%,P=0.05),且无进展生存期(中位值:15.3 个月比 7.6 个月)显著延长。
同时给予 mFOLFOX6(联合或不联合贝伐珠单抗)和经肝动脉给予 DEBIRI(FOLFOX-DEBIRI)是安全的,不会导致治疗延迟或增加化疗的全身毒性。这种策略可提高总体缓解率、改善肝无进展生存期,并使更多的患者肿瘤缩小到可切除,从而获得更持久的总体无进展生存期。