The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1770-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7901. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is associated with improved local control and may result in complete tumor response. Associations between tumor response and disease control following radical resection should be established before tumor response is used to evaluate treatment strategies. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare oncologic outcomes associated with the degree of pathologic response after chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with locally advanced (cT3-4 or cN+ by endorectal ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging) rectal carcinoma diagnosed from 1993 to 2008 at our institution and treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical resection were identified, and their records were retrospectively reviewed. The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis (DM), and local recurrence (LR) rates were compared among patients with complete (ypT0N0), intermediate (ypT1-2N0), or poor (ypT3-4 or N+) response by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: In all, 725 patients were classified by tumor response: complete (131; 18.1%), intermediate (210; 29.0%), and poor (384; 53.0%). Age, sex, cN stage, and tumor location were not related to tumor response. Tumor response (complete v intermediate v poor) was associated with 5-year RFS (90.5% v 78.7% v 58.5%; P < .001), 5-year DM rates (7.0% v 10.1% v 26.5%; P < .001), and 5-year LR only rates (0% v 1.4% v 4.4%; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing radical resection is an early surrogate marker and correlate to oncologic outcomes. These data provide guidance with response-stratified oncologic benchmarks for comparisons of novel treatment strategies.
目的:新辅助放化疗治疗直肠癌可提高局部控制率,并可能导致肿瘤完全缓解。在将肿瘤反应用于评估治疗策略之前,应确定肿瘤反应与根治性切除术后疾病控制之间的关联。本研究的目的是评估和比较新辅助放化疗后病理反应程度与肿瘤学结果的关系。
方法:本研究回顾性分析了 1993 年至 2008 年在我院诊断为局部晚期(直肠腔内超声、计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像提示 cT3-4 或 cN+)直肠癌并接受新辅助放化疗和根治性切除的所有患者的记录。中位放疗剂量为 50.4Gy,同时给予化疗。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和多因素 Cox 比例风险回归比较完全缓解(ypT0N0)、中间缓解(ypT1-2N0)和不良缓解(ypT3-4 或 N+)患者的无复发生存率(RFS)、远处转移(DM)和局部复发(LR)率。
结果:共有 725 例患者按肿瘤反应分类:完全缓解(131 例,18.1%)、中间缓解(210 例,29.0%)和不良缓解(384 例,53.0%)。年龄、性别、cN 分期和肿瘤位置与肿瘤反应无关。肿瘤反应(完全缓解、中间缓解和不良缓解)与 5 年 RFS(90.5%、78.7%、58.5%;P<0.001)、5 年 DM 率(7.0%、10.1%、26.5%;P<0.001)和 5 年 LR 率(0%、1.4%、4.4%;P=0.002)相关。
结论:接受根治性切除的局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助放化疗的治疗反应是早期替代标志物,与肿瘤学结果相关。这些数据为比较新治疗策略的反应分层肿瘤学基准提供了指导。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017-9
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025-5-31
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010-11
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009-10
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008-9-1