Institut für Physiologische Chemie, Universitätsklinikum, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
J Surg Res. 2013 Jan;179(1):e57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
Tissue protection against ischemia (I)/reperfusion (R) injury by heparins can be due to their anticoagulant and/or non-anticoagulant properties. Here we studied the protective potential of the anticoagulant and the non-anticoagulant features of heparin sodium (HepSo) and enoxaparin (Enox) against mesenteric I/R injury in a rat model.
Mesenteric I/R was induced in rats (n = 6 per group) by superior mesenteric artery occlusion (SMAO; 90 min) and reopening (120 min). Therapeutic/clinical and subtherapeutic/non-anticoagulant doses of HepSo (0.25 mg/kg bolus + 0.25 mg/kg × h; 0.05 mg/kg bolus + 0.1 mg/kg × h) or Enox (0.5 mg/kg bolus + 0.5 mg/kg × h; 0.05 mg/kg bolus + 0.1 mg/kg × h) were administered intravenously starting 30 min before SMAO to the end of reperfusion. Systemic/vital and intestinal microcirculatory parameters were measured during the whole experimental procedure, those of small intestine injury at the end.
During intestinal reperfusion, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rates were significantly increased by HepSo and, less effectively, by Enox, in a dose-dependent manner. Intestinal microcirculation was only affected by the therapeutic HepSo dose, which decreased the microvascular flow and S(O2) during reperfusion. The subtherapeutic Enox treatment, as opposed to any HepSo dose, most effectively diminished I/R-induced intestinal hemorrhages, myeloperoxidase activity (as a measure of neutrophil invasion), and histopathological changes.
Therapeutic but, to a lesser extent, also the subtherapeutic doses of both HepSo and Enox clearly improve hemodynamics during mesenteric reperfusion, while intestinal protection is exclusively provided by Enox, especially at its subtherapeutic dose. Alterations in intestinal microcirculation are not responsible for these effects. Thus, non-anticoagulant Enox doses and, preferably, heparin(oid)s unable to affect coagulation, could diminish clinical risks of I/R-induced gastrointestinal complications.
肝素通过抗凝和/或非抗凝特性对缺血(I)/再灌注(R)损伤的组织保护作用。在这里,我们在大鼠模型中研究了肝素钠(HepSo)和依诺肝素(Enox)的抗凝和非抗凝特性对肠系膜 I/R 损伤的保护潜力。
通过肠系膜上动脉闭塞(SMAO;90 分钟)和再开放(120 分钟)诱导大鼠肠系膜 I/R(每组 6 只)。在 SMAO 前 30 分钟开始至再灌注结束,静脉内给予 HepSo(0.25mg/kg 推注+0.25mg/kg×h;0.05mg/kg 推注+0.1mg/kg×h)或 Enox(0.5mg/kg 推注+0.5mg/kg×h;0.05mg/kg 推注+0.1mg/kg×h)的治疗/临床和亚治疗/非抗凝剂量。在整个实验过程中测量全身/生命和肠道微循环参数,在最后测量小肠损伤。
在肠道再灌注期间,HepSo 以剂量依赖性方式显著增加平均动脉血压和心率,而依诺肝素的作用则较弱。肠道微循环仅受治疗性 HepSo 剂量的影响,该剂量降低了再灌注期间的微血管流量和 S(O2)。与任何 HepSo 剂量相反,亚治疗性 Enox 治疗最有效地减少了 I/R 引起的肠出血、髓过氧化物酶活性(作为中性粒细胞浸润的衡量标准)和组织病理学变化。
治疗性但也较小程度的 HepSo 和 Enox 的亚治疗剂量在肠系膜再灌注期间明显改善血液动力学,而肠道保护仅由 Enox 提供,尤其是在亚治疗剂量下。肠道微循环的改变与这些影响无关。因此,非抗凝性 Enox 剂量,最好是不能影响凝血的肝素(类),可能会降低 I/R 引起的胃肠道并发症的临床风险。