• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气压弹道碎石术与钬激光碎石术治疗小儿输尿管结石的比较。

Comparison of pneumatic and laser lithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric ureteral stones.

机构信息

Dicle University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, 21280 Diyarbakir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Jun;9(3):308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.03.004
PMID:22494964
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of pneumatic and holmium:YAG laser lithotripters in the treatment of pediatric ureterolithiasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients treated using pneumatic (PL) (n = 29) or laser (LL) (n = 35) lithotripter between 2009 and 2011 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were evaluated with respect to age, gender, stone size, complications, and stone-free rates 1 month after the operation.

RESULTS

For the PL and LL groups, mean ages (8.8 ± 3.4 and 8.3 ± 3.5 years), male/female ratios (19:10 and 22:13) and stone locations were similar (p > 0.05). Mean stone sizes were 55.6 mm2 and 47.6 mm2 in the PL and LL group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.850). Mean operative times were 20.5 min in the PL group and 25.2 min in the LL group, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.020). Stone-free rates 1 month after intervention were 79% in the PL group and 97% in the LL group (p = 0.022). Stone migration was detected in the PL group (n = 6) and in the LL group (n = 1). No major complication was found in either group.

CONCLUSION

In the ureteroscopic treatment of pediatric ureterolithiasis, both pneumatic and laser lithotripters are effective and successful. However, laser lithotripsy has a higher stone-free rate and lower complication rate.

摘要

目的

比较气动和钬激光碎石器治疗小儿输尿管结石的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

回顾性分析 2009 年至 2011 年间使用气动(PL)(n = 29)或激光(LL)(n = 35)碎石器治疗的患者的病历。对患者的年龄、性别、结石大小、并发症以及术后 1 个月的结石清除率进行评估。

结果

PL 和 LL 组的平均年龄(8.8 ± 3.4 和 8.3 ± 3.5 岁)、男女比例(19:10 和 22:13)和结石位置相似(p > 0.05)。PL 和 LL 组的平均结石大小分别为 55.6 mm2 和 47.6 mm2,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.850)。PL 组的平均手术时间为 20.5 分钟,LL 组为 25.2 分钟,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.020)。干预后 1 个月的结石清除率分别为 PL 组 79%和 LL 组 97%(p = 0.022)。PL 组(n = 6)和 LL 组(n = 1)均发现结石迁移。两组均未发现严重并发症。

结论

在小儿输尿管结石的输尿管镜治疗中,气动和激光碎石器均有效且成功。然而,激光碎石术具有更高的结石清除率和更低的并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
Comparison of pneumatic and laser lithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric ureteral stones.气压弹道碎石术与钬激光碎石术治疗小儿输尿管结石的比较。
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Jun;9(3):308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
2
Ho:YAG laser versus pneumatic lithotripsy for management of pediatric ureteral stones: a prospective-comparative analysis with adults.钬:YAG 激光与气压弹道碎石术治疗小儿输尿管结石的前瞻性对比分析——与成人比较。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Feb;16(1):35.e1-35.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus ballistic lithotripsy for treatment of ureteric stones: a prospective comparative study.输尿管镜下激光碎石术与气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石的前瞻性对照研究。
Urol Int. 2009;82(3):341-5. doi: 10.1159/000209369. Epub 2009 May 11.
4
Comparison of Ho:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of impacted ureteral stones: an analysis of risk factors.钬激光与气压弹道碎石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管结石的比较:危险因素分析
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014 Mar;30(3):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
5
Effect of Stone Composition on the Outcomes of Semi-Rigid Ureteroscopy Using Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser or Pneumatic Lithotripsy.结石成分对使用钬:钇铝石榴石激光或气压弹道碎石术的半硬性输尿管镜检查结果的影响。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Apr;27(4):227-231.
6
Laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in the endoscopic management of large ureteric stones: a comparative study.激光与气压弹道碎石术在内镜下治疗大型输尿管结石中的应用:一项对比研究
Urol Int. 2012;88(3):311-5. doi: 10.1159/000336254. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
7
[Comparative study of pneumatic lithotripsy and holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones].气压弹道碎石术与钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的对比研究
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2005 Oct;30(5):601-3.
8
Treatment of ureteric calculi--use of Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy versus pneumatic lithoclast.输尿管结石的治疗——钬激光碎石术与气压弹道碎石术的应用比较
J Pak Med Assoc. 2007 Sep;57(9):440-3.
9
Use of NTrap during ureteroscopic Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy of upper ureteral calculi.NTrap在输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗上段输尿管结石中的应用。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012 Mar;21(2):78-82. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2011.559249. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
10
Safety and efficacy of pneumatic lithotripters versus holmium laser in management of ureteral calculi: a randomized clinical trial.气压弹道碎石机与钬激光治疗输尿管结石的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验
Urol J. 2013 Winter;10(1):762-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Cystine Stones in Children: An Observational, Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis.儿童胱氨酸结石的体外冲击波碎石术:一项观察性、回顾性、单中心分析
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 16;9:763317. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.763317. eCollection 2021.
2
Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease in Paediatric Population is Safe and Effective in Medium-Volume and High-Volume Centres: Evidence from a Systematic Review.输尿管镜检查在中高手术量中心治疗儿童结石病安全有效:一项系统评价的证据
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Oct 18;18(12):92. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0742-3.
3
CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.
加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(11-12):E837-51. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3483. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
4
A comparison of efficacies of holmium YAG laser, and pneumatic lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones.钬激光与气压弹道碎石术在内镜治疗输尿管结石中的疗效比较。
Turk J Urol. 2014 Sep;40(3):138-43. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.46548.
5
Comparison of ultrasonic and pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripsy techniques during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术中超声与气压弹道体内碎石技术的比较。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Aug 18;2013:604361. doi: 10.1155/2013/604361. eCollection 2013.
6
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic laser lithotripsy for urinary stone treatment in children.内镜激光碎石术治疗儿童尿路结石的疗效与安全性
Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):751-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0495-x. Epub 2012 Jul 24.