• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二维经阴道超声测量子宫下段厚度视频序列的可靠性。

Reliability of two-dimensional transvaginal sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness using video sequences.

机构信息

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2012 Aug;29(7):527-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310524. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1055/s-0032-1310524
PMID:22495899
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To report the intra- and interobserver reliability of measurement of the lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness using transvaginal sonographic videos.

METHODS

A prospective study of 60 women with previous, low-transverse cesarean undergoing LUS examination (36 to 39 weeks) was performed. Two observers independently measured full LUS thickness using transvaginal sonography. A video of the LUS was recorded and analyzed more than 2 months later by both observers. Intra- and interobserver reliability was assessed with median absolute differences and interquartile range (IQR), nonparametric limits of agreement, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

Median full LUS thickness was 3.6 mm (range: 0.9 to 8.0 mm). Intraobserver repeatability was excellent (median difference: 0.2 mm, IQR: 0.1 to 0.4; ICC: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90 to 0.96; kappa: 1.00). Interobserver (median difference: 0.3 mm, IQR: 0.2 to 1.3; ICC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.95; kappa: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.98) and intermethod reproducibility (median difference: 0.4 mm, IQR: 0.2 to 0.8; ICC: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.89; kappa: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.94) were good. However, both interobserver and intermethod reproducibility were improved when LUS thickness was below 3 mm.

CONCLUSION

Full LUS thickness measured from transvaginal sonographic videos has excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility and good reproducibility with live transvaginal ultrasound.

摘要

目的

报告使用经阴道超声视频测量子宫下段(LUS)厚度的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。

方法

对 60 名经阴道超声检查的既往低横位剖宫产妇女(36 至 39 周)进行了前瞻性研究。两名观察者独立使用经阴道超声测量完整的 LUS 厚度。记录 LUS 的视频,并由两名观察者在 2 个月后以上进行分析。使用中位数绝对差异和四分位间距(IQR)、非参数协议界限、95%置信区间(95%CI)内的组内相关系数(ICC)和kappa 系数评估观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。

结果

中位完整 LUS 厚度为 3.6 毫米(范围:0.9 至 8.0 毫米)。观察者内重复性极好(中位数差异:0.2 毫米,IQR:0.1 至 0.4;ICC:0.94,95%CI:0.90 至 0.96;kappa:1.00)。观察者间(中位数差异:0.3 毫米,IQR:0.2 至 1.3;ICC:0.91,95%CI:0.86 至 0.95;kappa:0.76,95%CI:0.54 至 0.98)和间方法重复性(中位数差异:0.4 毫米,IQR:0.2 至 0.8;ICC:0.82,95%CI:0.72 至 0.89;kappa:0.69,95%CI:0.43 至 0.94)良好。然而,当 LUS 厚度低于 3 毫米时,观察者间和间方法的重复性均得到改善。

结论

从经阴道超声视频测量的完整 LUS 厚度具有极好的观察者内和观察者间可重复性,并且与实时经阴道超声具有良好的可重复性。

相似文献

1
Reliability of two-dimensional transvaginal sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness using video sequences.二维经阴道超声测量子宫下段厚度视频序列的可靠性。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Aug;29(7):527-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310524. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
2
Reliability of 3-dimensional transvaginal sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness.经阴道三维超声测量子宫下段厚度的可靠性。
J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Jun;31(6):933-9. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.6.933.
3
Lower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound.经阴道和经腹二维及三维超声测量剖宫产术后孕妇子宫下段厚度的可靠性分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):301-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.6224.
4
2D versus 3D transabdominal sonography for the measurement of lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous cesarean delivery.二维与三维经腹超声测量有剖宫产史妇女子宫下段厚度的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Sep;114(3):234-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.03.021. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
5
Inter- and intraobserver variability in sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment after a previous Cesarean section.既往剖宫产术后子宫下段超声测量的观察者间及观察者内变异
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;27(4):420-4. doi: 10.1002/uog.2718.
6
Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis.超声测量子宫下段厚度预测剖宫产术后再次经阴道分娩子宫破裂的Meta 分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;42(2):132-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.12479.
7
Lower uterine segment thickness assessed by transvaginal ultrasound before labor induction: reproducibility analysis and relationship with delivery outcome.引产前行经阴道超声评估子宫下段厚度:重复性分析及其与分娩结局的关系
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;61(3):399-407. doi: 10.1002/uog.26024. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
8
Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section.经超声测量有剖宫产史女性的子宫下段厚度。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Jul;27(7):674-81. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30545-x.
9
Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.既往有剖宫产史的孕妇足月时子宫下段厚度的超声评估。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;292(3):609-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3687-0. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
10
Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.经超声评估既往有一次剖宫产史女性的子宫下段厚度。
Minerva Ginecol. 2013 Oct;65(5):551-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in parturients with previous scar in labor: a cross-sectional study.经产妇分娩时子宫下段厚度的超声测量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 14;22(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04747-3.
2
A cluster-randomized trial to reduce major perinatal morbidity among women with one prior cesarean delivery in Québec (PRISMA trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项旨在降低魁北克有过一次剖宫产史女性围产期主要发病率的整群随机试验(PRISMA试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Sep 20;18(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2150-x.
3
A simplified cervix model in response to induction balloon in pre-labour.
一种针对引产球囊在临产前反应的简化子宫颈模型。
Theor Biol Med Model. 2013 Sep 26;10:58. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-10-58.