Suppr超能文献

合并物质使用障碍对单一和联合抗抑郁药物治疗重度抑郁症疗效的影响:一项单盲随机试验的探索性分析。

Effect of concurrent substance use disorder on the effectiveness of single and combination antidepressant medications for the treatment of major depression: an exploratory analysis of a single-blind randomized trial.

机构信息

VA Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35404, United States.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2012 Feb;29(2):111-22. doi: 10.1002/da.20918.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The co-occurrence of substance use disorder (SUD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) is common and is often thought to impair response to antidepressant therapy. These patients are often excluded from clinical trials, resulting in a significant knowledge gap regarding optimal pharmacotherapy for the treatment of MDD with concurrent SUD.

METHODS

In the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes study, 665 adult outpatients with chronic and/or recurrent MDD were prospectively treated with either escitalopram monotherapy (escitalopram and placebo) or an antidepressant combination (venalfaxine-XR and mirtazapine or escitalopram and bupropion-SR). Participants with MDD and concurrent SUD (13.1%) were compared to those without SUD (86.9%) on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics at baseline and treatment response at 12- and 28-week endpoints.

RESULTS

The participants with MDD and SUD were more likely to be male and have current suicidal thoughts/plans, and had a greater lifetime severity and number of suicide attempts, and a higher number of concurrent Axis I disorders, particularly concurrent anxiety disorders. There were no significant differences between the MDD with or without SUD groups in terms of dose, time in treatment, response or remission at week 12 and 28. Furthermore, no significant differences in response or remission rates were noted between groups on the basis of the presence or absence of SUD and treatment assignment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although significant baseline sociodemographic and clinical differences exist, patients with MDD and concurrent SUD are as likely to respond and remit to a single or combination antidepressant treatment as those presenting without SUD.

摘要

背景

物质使用障碍(SUD)和重性抑郁障碍(MDD)共病较为常见,且通常被认为会影响抗抑郁治疗的反应。这些患者常被排除在临床试验之外,导致针对共病 SUD 的 MDD 最佳药物治疗的知识缺口较大。

方法

在合并用药以改善抑郁结局研究中,665 例慢性和/或复发性 MDD 的成年门诊患者前瞻性地接受了艾司西酞普兰单药治疗(艾司西酞普兰和安慰剂)或抗抑郁药联合治疗(文拉法辛 XR 和米氮平或艾司西酞普兰和安非他酮 SR)。在基线和 12 周和 28 周终点的治疗反应方面,将 MDD 合并 SUD(13.1%)的患者与无 SUD(86.9%)的患者进行比较。

结果

MDD 合并 SUD 的患者更有可能为男性,有当前自杀意念/计划,且终生严重程度和自杀企图次数较多,同时共病的 1 轴障碍较多,尤其是共病焦虑障碍。MDD 合并或不合并 SUD 的患者在剂量、治疗时间、12 周和 28 周时的反应或缓解率方面均无显著差异。此外,根据 SUD 的存在与否和治疗分组,两组之间在反应或缓解率方面均无显著差异。

结论

尽管存在显著的基线社会人口统计学和临床差异,但 MDD 合并 SUD 的患者对单药或联合抗抑郁治疗的反应和缓解率与无 SUD 的患者相似。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
CMAJ. 2024 May 20;196(19):E685-E686. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.149917-l-f.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验