Suppr超能文献

相位射频能量和多电极导管消融治疗房颤时肺静脉隔离和左心房复杂碎裂心房电图的安全性。

Safety of pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial complex fractionated atrial electrograms ablation for atrial fibrillation with phased radiofrequency energy and multi-electrode catheters.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Europace. 2012 Oct;14(10):1433-40. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus086. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

Abstract

AIMS

Recently, a multi-electrode catheter system using phased radiofrequency (RF) energy was developed specifically for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation: the pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC), the multi-array septal catheter (MASC), and the multi-array ablation catheter (MAAC). Initial results of small trials have been promising: shorter procedure times and low adverse event rates. In a large single-centre registry, we evaluated the adverse events associated with multi-electrode ablation catheter procedures with PVAC alone, or combined with MASC and MAAC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In all, 634 consecutive patients with AF had 663 procedures with multi-electrode ablation catheters, 502 patients with the PVAC alone, 128 patients with PVAC/MASC/MAAC, 29 redo procedures with the PVAC or PVAC/MASC/MAAC, and 4 patients had a complicated transseptal puncture. Major and minor adverse events during 6 month follow-up were registered. In 15 cases (2.3%), major adverse events were seen within the first month after the procedure. These included complicated transseptal puncture (4), stroke (2), transient ischaemic attack (5), acute coronary syndrome (2), femoral pseudoaneurysm (1), and arteriovenous fistulae (1). Minor adverse events were seen in 10.7% at 6 months, mostly due to femoral haematoma (3.9%), and non-significant PV stenosis (5.2%). There was no difference in the occurrence of major adverse events between PVAC alone, or PVAC/MASC/MAAC ablation.

CONCLUSION

Ablation with phased RF and multi-electrode catheters is accompanied by a major adverse event rate of 2.3% within 1 month and a minor event rate of 10.7% at 6 months.

摘要

目的

最近,一种专门用于心房颤动(AF)消融的多电极导管系统,即相位射频(RF)能量多电极导管系统,已经开发出来:肺静脉消融导管(PVAC)、多阵列隔导管(MASC)和多阵列消融导管(MAAC)。小型试验的初步结果令人鼓舞:手术时间更短,不良事件发生率更低。在一项大型单中心注册研究中,我们评估了单独使用 PVAC 或联合使用 MASC 和 MAAC 进行多电极消融导管手术相关的不良事件。

方法和结果

共有 634 例连续的 AF 患者接受了 663 次多电极消融导管手术,其中 502 例单独使用 PVAC,128 例联合使用 PVAC/MASC/MAAC,29 例再次使用 PVAC 或 PVAC/MASC/MAAC,4 例发生复杂的经房间隔穿刺。在 6 个月的随访期间,记录了主要和次要不良事件。在 15 例(2.3%)患者中,在术后第一个月出现了主要不良事件。这些不良事件包括复杂的经房间隔穿刺(4 例)、中风(2 例)、短暂性脑缺血发作(5 例)、急性冠状动脉综合征(2 例)、股假性动脉瘤(1 例)和动静脉瘘(1 例)。在 6 个月时,有 10.7%的患者出现了次要不良事件,主要是由于股血肿(3.9%)和非显著的 PV 狭窄(5.2%)。单独使用 PVAC 或 PVAC/MASC/MAAC 消融的主要不良事件发生率没有差异。

结论

使用相位 RF 和多电极导管进行消融,在 1 个月内的主要不良事件发生率为 2.3%,在 6 个月时的次要不良事件发生率为 10.7%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验