• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《患者保护与平价医疗法案》:预防与宣传的机遇

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: opportunities for prevention and advocacy.

作者信息

Galer-Unti Regina A

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2012 May;13(3):308-12. doi: 10.1177/1524839912438750. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1177/1524839912438750
PMID:22496458
Abstract

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has come under intense scrutiny about its mandate for individual health insurance purchase, yet it has received little praise in the popular press for its prevention measures. Irrespective of the Supreme Court's decision regarding the "individual mandate," it is important for public health professionals to advocate for the preservation of the prevention and wellness provisions in the current law. The article addresses the Supreme Court's hearing for the "individual mandate," the likely impact of the general election in 2012, and specific prevention components of the law that should be championed by health education and health promotion advocates.

摘要

《患者保护与平价医疗法案》因其要求个人购买医疗保险的规定而受到了严格审查,但在大众媒体上,其预防措施却鲜受赞誉。无论最高法院对“个人强制保险条款”做出何种裁决,公共卫生专业人员倡导保留现行法律中的预防和健康条款都很重要。本文讨论了最高法院对“个人强制保险条款”的听证会、2012年大选可能产生的影响,以及健康教育和健康促进倡导者应支持的该法律的具体预防内容。

相似文献

1
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: opportunities for prevention and advocacy.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》:预防与宣传的机遇
Health Promot Pract. 2012 May;13(3):308-12. doi: 10.1177/1524839912438750. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
2
The US Supreme Court's ruling on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.美国最高法院对《患者保护与平价医疗法案》的裁决。
BMJ. 2012 Jun 29;344:e4503. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4503.
3
The Affordable Care Act largely survives the Supreme Court's scrutiny--but barely.平价医疗法案(Affordable Care Act)在很大程度上经受住了最高法院的严格审查——但只是勉强过关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Aug;31(8):1659-62. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0738.
4
In the wake of the verdict: the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the federal health law leaves lawmakers working out what it means for their states.裁决之后:美国最高法院对联邦医疗保健法的裁决让立法者们琢磨这对他们的州意味着什么。
State Legis. 2012 Jul-Aug;38(7):46-7.
5
The severability of the individual mandate.个人强制医保条款的可分割性。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 29;366(13):e19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1201951. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
6
The constitutionality of the individual mandate.个人强制医保条款的合宪性。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 27;365(17):e36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1111039.
7
Health care reform round 2: The Supreme Court largely upheld the law revamping health insurance. Now what?医疗保健改革第二轮:最高法院在很大程度上维持了修订医疗保险的法律。现在该怎么办?
Diabetes Forecast. 2012 Sep;65(9):42-5.
8
Two steps forward, one step back? Implications of the Supreme Court's health reform ruling for individuals with mental illness.前进两步,后退一步?最高法院医保改革裁决对精神病患者的影响
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;70(6):567-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.25.
9
State sovereign standing: often overlooked, but not forgotten.国家主权地位:常被忽视,但未被遗忘。
Stanford Law Rev. 2012 Jan;64(1):89-124.
10
In the balance: With the drama of Supreme Court arguments over, providers are left to worry what will happen if the individual mandate is struck down.
Mod Healthc. 2012 Apr 2;42(14):6-7, 14-5, 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Voices of the "99 Percent": The Role of Online Narrative to Improve Health Care.“99%”的声音:在线叙事在改善医疗保健方面的作用。
Perm J. 2016 Fall;20(4):15-224. doi: 10.7812/TPP/15-224. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
2
Childhood cancer survivors' familiarity with and opinions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.儿童癌症幸存者对《患者保护与平价医疗法案》的熟悉程度和意见。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Sep;9(5):246-50. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000919. Epub 2013 Jul 9.