• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用永久性 Becker 扩张器植入物进行乳房重建:18 年的经验。

Breast reconstruction using permanent Becker expander implants: an 18 year experience.

机构信息

Breast Unit, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, SO22 5DG, UK.

出版信息

Breast. 2012 Dec;21(6):764-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2012.03.007
PMID:22497782
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-stage reconstruction using permanent expander implants is an established technique following mastectomy. Short and long-term outcome data following breast reconstruction using Becker tissue expanders is limited.

METHOD

A retrospective case note review of patients undergoing expander-based procedures between 1989 and 2007 was undertaken. Data recorded included postoperative symptoms and complications, the use of radiotherapy, revisional surgery, and device failure.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirteen expanders were used in 276 patients with a mean age of 48.3 (17-78) years, over the 18 year study period. The mean follow up period was 64.6 (1-199) months. 256 Becker expanders were used during 175 latissimus dorsi (LD) and 52 subpectoral (SP) reconstructions, 13 contralateral augmentations and 16 implant replacements. The postoperative infection rate was 5.8%, leading to an expander loss rate of 3.8%. The use of prophylactic antibiotics was associated with an increased postoperative infection rate (p = 0.046). Six haematomas (2.5%) and 12 cases of skin envelope necrosis (5.0%) required unscheduled intervention. Symptoms of pain, distortion and hardness were experienced by 21.3% of patients, and radiotherapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse symptoms (p < 0.0001). No patient developed symptomatic implant rupture or silicone granuloma but 17.9% of reconstructions underwent revisional surgery, the rate being highest following SP reconstruction (p = 0.029). Nine patients developed injection port complications (3.8%), and the overall device failure rate was 1.3%. The original expander has been retained by 74.2% of women.

CONCLUSION

The Becker permanent expander is a reliable implant associated with a low complication rate and a high retention rate when used during breast reconstruction.

摘要

背景

乳房切除术后,使用一次性扩张器植入物进行一期重建是一种已确立的技术。使用 Becker 组织扩张器进行乳房重建后的短期和长期结果数据有限。

方法

对 1989 年至 2007 年间接受扩张器手术的患者进行回顾性病历回顾。记录的数据包括术后症状和并发症、放疗的使用、修正手术和设备故障。

结果

在 18 年的研究期间,313 个扩张器在 276 名平均年龄为 48.3(17-78)岁的患者中使用。平均随访时间为 64.6(1-199)个月。在 175 例背阔肌(LD)和 52 例胸肌下(SP)重建、13 例对侧增强和 16 例植入物更换中使用了 256 个 Becker 扩张器。术后感染率为 5.8%,导致扩张器丢失率为 3.8%。预防性使用抗生素与术后感染率增加相关(p = 0.046)。6 例血肿(2.5%)和 12 例皮肤包膜坏死(5.0%)需要非计划干预。21.3%的患者出现疼痛、变形和硬度症状,放疗与不良症状的发生风险显著增加(p < 0.0001)。无患者出现症状性植入物破裂或硅胶肉芽肿,但 17.9%的重建术需要修正手术,SP 重建术的发生率最高(p = 0.029)。9 例患者出现注射端口并发症(3.8%),总设备故障发生率为 1.3%。74.2%的女性保留了原始扩张器。

结论

Becker 永久性扩张器是一种可靠的植入物,在乳房重建中使用时并发症发生率低,保留率高。

相似文献

1
Breast reconstruction using permanent Becker expander implants: an 18 year experience.采用永久性 Becker 扩张器植入物进行乳房重建:18 年的经验。
Breast. 2012 Dec;21(6):764-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
2
Becker expander implants: truly a long term single stage reconstruction?贝克扩张器植入物:真正的长期单阶段重建?
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Aug;63(8):1300-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
3
Multicenter study on breast reconstruction outcome using Becker implants.贝克尔假体乳房重建效果的多中心研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;35(1):66-72. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9559-x. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
4
Radiation therapy and expander-implant breast reconstruction: an analysis of timing and comparison of complications.放射治疗与扩张器-植入物乳房重建:时机分析及并发症比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Sep;71(3):269-73. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182834b63.
5
Immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction compared with one-stage permanent implant breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of short-term complications.即刻两阶段组织扩张器乳房重建与一期永久性植入物乳房重建的比较:短期并发症的多机构比较
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013 Oct;47(5):344-9. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.767202. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
6
Long-term reconstructive outcomes after expander-implant breast reconstruction with serious infectious or wound-healing complications.扩张器-植入物乳房重建术后出现严重感染或伤口愈合并发症的长期重建效果。
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):369-73. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823aee67.
7
Delayed breast reconstruction with transverse latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap using Becker expander implants in patients submitted to radiotherapy: A series of cases.在接受放疗的患者中使用贝克尔扩张器植入物经背阔肌肌皮瓣进行延迟乳房重建:一系列病例
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Jul;72(7):1067-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Risk factors for complications of radiation therapy on tissue expander breast reconstructions.组织扩张器乳房重建术后放疗并发症的危险因素。
Breast J. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):28-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01182.x. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
9
Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.延迟腹部自体组织重建与背阔肌肌皮瓣加植入物重建用于既往接受过放疗患者的效果比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):380-2. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824b3d6b.
10
One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction.采用植入物的一期即刻乳房重建:即刻重建的一种新选择。
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Aug;69(2):134-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182250c60.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended Prophylactic Antibiotics for Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.延期预防性使用抗生素用于即刻乳房重建的乳房切除术:一项荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Jan 27;8(1):e2613. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002613. eCollection 2020 Jan.
2
Breast reconstruction with anatomical implants: A review of indications and techniques based on current literature.解剖型乳房植入物乳房再造术:基于当前文献的适应症与技术综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jul 20;21:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.047. eCollection 2017 Sep.