Levine Steven M, Patel Nima, Disa Joseph J
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):380-2. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824b3d6b.
Local recurrence after breast conservation therapy is usually managed with salvage mastectomy. Multiple methods of reconstruction are possible, although delayed autologous reconstruction provides the most reliable results.
We compared complications in delayed abdominal-based [transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM)/deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP)] reconstruction with delayed latissimus dorsi plus implant-based reconstruction in previously irradiated breasts. The authors reviewed 133 consecutive cases of delayed breast reconstructions performed in patients who had postmastectomy radiation therapy and reconstruction with abdominal-based methods (single-pedicle TRAM, supercharged pedicle TRAM, muscle-sparing TRAM free flap, DIEP flap, and superficial inferior epigastric artery flap) or a pedicled latissimus dorsi flap plus implant. Complications for donor and recipient sites were recorded including infection, seroma, hematoma, and partial flap loss.
Seventy-five patients were reconstructed with abdominal-based flaps (37 muscle-sparing TRAMs, 19 pedicled TRAMs, 12 DIEPs, 6 supercharged pedicled TRAMs, and 1 superficial inferior epigastric artery). Their median age was 50 years and mean follow-up was 22.7 months. Three (4.0%) patients required reoperation during the same hospital visit for vascular compromise that resulted in 2 (2.7%) flap failures. Three (4.0%) patients had partial flap loss that ultimately required debridement and primary closure. Seventeen (22.7%) patients had minor complications including seroma, small hematoma, cellulitis, and abdominal bulge. Fifty-six patients were reconstructed with latissimus dorsi flaps plus implants. Their median age was 47 years and mean follow-up was 32 months. Three (5.4%) patients developed infections resulting in implant loss. Four (7.1%) patients had partial flap loss that required debridement and primary closure. Thirteen (23.2%) patients had minor complications including seroma (12 patients) and hematoma (1 patient) that required drainage. Fisher exact test was used to determine statistical significance of complication and failure rates between the 2 types of reconstruction. In patients who had postmastectomy radiation therapy, those with abdominal-based reconstructions had fewer complications compared with latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstructions (28.0% vs 30.4%, P=0.846). Also, fewer reconstructions failed in patients with abdominal-based reconstruction (2.7% vs 5.4%, P=0.650).
Abdominal-based autologous reconstruction had fewer complications and fewer reconstruction failures than latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstructions in patients with postmastectomy radiation therapy in our series; however, these rates were not statistically significant.
保乳治疗后局部复发通常采用挽救性乳房切除术处理。虽然延迟自体乳房重建能提供最可靠的结果,但仍有多种重建方法可供选择。
我们比较了在先前接受过放疗的乳房中,延迟的腹部带蒂皮瓣(腹直肌肌皮瓣/腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣)重建与延迟的背阔肌肌皮瓣加乳房假体植入重建的并发症情况。作者回顾了133例连续的延迟乳房重建病例,这些患者均接受了乳房切除术后放疗,并采用腹部带蒂皮瓣法(单蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣、增压蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣、保留肌肉的腹直肌肌皮瓣游离皮瓣、腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣和腹壁浅动脉皮瓣)或带蒂背阔肌肌皮瓣加乳房假体进行重建。记录供区和受区的并发症,包括感染、血清肿、血肿和部分皮瓣坏死。
75例患者采用腹部带蒂皮瓣重建(37例保留肌肉的腹直肌肌皮瓣、19例带蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣、12例腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣、6例增压蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣和1例腹壁浅动脉皮瓣)。她们的中位年龄为50岁,平均随访时间为22.7个月。3例(4.0%)患者在同一次住院期间因血管受压需要再次手术,导致2例(约2.7%)皮瓣坏死。3例(4.0%)患者出现部分皮瓣坏死,最终需要清创和一期缝合。17例(22.7%)患者出现轻微并发症,包括血清肿、小血肿、蜂窝织炎和腹部膨隆。56例患者采用背阔肌肌皮瓣加乳房假体重建。她们的中位年龄为47岁,平均随访时间为32个月。3例(5.4%)患者发生感染导致乳房假体取出。4例(7.1%)患者出现部分皮瓣坏死,需要清创和一期缝合。13例(23.2%)患者出现轻微并发症,包括血清肿(12例)和血肿(1例),需要引流。采用Fisher精确检验确定两种重建方式并发症和失败率的统计学意义。在接受乳房切除术后放疗的患者中,腹部带蒂皮瓣重建的并发症少于背阔肌肌皮瓣加乳房假体重建(28.0%对30.4%,P = 0.846)。同样,腹部带蒂皮瓣重建失败的患者也较少(2.7%对5.4%,P = 0.650)。
在我们的系列研究中,接受乳房切除术后放疗的患者,腹部带蒂自体乳房重建的并发症和重建失败率均低于背阔肌肌皮瓣加乳房假体重建;然而,这些差异无统计学意义。