Korta Murua J, Pérez-Yarza E G, Pértega Díaz S, Aldasoro Ruiz A, Sardón Prado O, López-Silvarrey Varela A, Corcuera Elósegui P, Mintegui Aramburu F J
Sección de Neumología Infantil, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, España.
An Pediatr (Barc). 2012 Oct;77(4):236-46. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
Our objective was to measure the impact of an educational intervention program on teacher's knowledge about asthma and its management.
Before and after quasi-experimental study, with control group, of an educational intervention, which had as its aim to improve the teacher's knowledge of asthma and its management, was conducted in some schools of San Sebastian (Gipuzkoa), Spain. The Newcastle Asthma knowledge Questionnaire (NAKQ) was used as a measuring tool, and an adaptation of the asthma, sport and health program was used as an educational intervention. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the total score of the questionnaire before and after the intervention, and the McNemar test was performed to compare the percentages of correct answers to each item. The Mann-Whitney U test was also performed to compare the baseline score and the score at three months between the intervention group and control group. The size of the effect and the standardised mean response were studied.
A total of 138 teachers from 6 schools, which were chosen at random (study group), and 43 teachers in the control group participated in the study. In the study group, the mean score of the NAKQ before the educational intervention was 16.1±3.4 points, with a median of 16 (range 7 to 23). After the intervention the mean score increased to 22.3±4.1, with a median of 23 (range, 6 to 29). The mean difference in the overall score of the NAKQ was 7.0±4.2 points, with a median of 8 (range, -2 to17). Furthermore, the size of the effect was 2.0 (> 0.8) and the standardised mean response was 1.7. After 3 months of the intervention the mean score of the NAKQ was 21.4±3.0 points, with a median of 22 (range, 12 to 29) which was significantly higher than the score obtained before the intervention (P<.001) and slightly lower than the score obtained immediately after the intervention, assuming a size of the effect of 1.6 and a standardised mean response of 1.2. In the control group, the level of knowledge did not change modified and was lower than the level of the intervention group (P<.001).
An educational intervention program conducted among teachers significantly increases their knowledge of asthma. Moreover, the increase reduces slightly but maintains its higher level for at least 3 months. In spite of the fact that some aspects of knowledge improved with the educational intervention, they were not optimal.
我们的目的是衡量一项教育干预计划对教师关于哮喘及其管理知识的影响。
在西班牙圣塞瓦斯蒂安(吉普斯夸省)的一些学校进行了一项前后对照的准实验研究,设立了对照组,实施旨在提高教师对哮喘及其管理知识的教育干预。使用纽卡斯尔哮喘知识问卷(NAKQ)作为测量工具,并采用哮喘、运动与健康计划的改编版作为教育干预措施。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较干预前后问卷的总分,采用McNemar检验比较各项目正确答案的百分比。还进行了Mann-Whitney U检验,以比较干预组和对照组的基线分数及三个月后的分数。研究了效应大小和标准化平均反应。
共有来自6所随机选取学校的138名教师(研究组)和43名对照组教师参与了研究。在研究组中,教育干预前NAKQ的平均分数为16.1±3.4分,中位数为16(范围7至23)。干预后平均分数提高到22.3±4.1分,中位数为23(范围6至29)。NAKQ总分的平均差异为7.0±4.2分,中位数为8(范围-2至17)。此外,效应大小为2.0(>0.8),标准化平均反应为1.7。干预3个月后,NAKQ的平均分数为21.4±3.0分,中位数为22(范围12至29),显著高于干预前获得的分数(P<0.001),且略低于干预后立即获得的分数,假设效应大小为1.6,标准化平均反应为1.2。在对照组中,知识水平没有变化且低于干预组(P<0.001)。
在教师中开展的教育干预计划显著提高了他们对哮喘的知识。此外,这种提高略有下降,但至少在3个月内保持较高水平。尽管通过教育干预知识的某些方面有所改善,但仍未达到最佳状态。