Ma Li-Xin, Liu Jian-Ping
Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing.
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2012 Jan;32(1):119-23.
To investigate whether the power of the effect size was based on adequate sample size in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using Chinese medicine.
China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI), VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), and Wangfang Data were systematically recruited using terms like "Xiaoke" or diabetes, Chinese herbal medicine, patent medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, randomized, controlled, blinded, and placebo-controlled. Limitation was set on the intervention course > or = 3 months in order to identify the information of outcome assessement and the sample size. Data collection forms were made according to the checking lists found in the CONSORT statement. Independent double data extractions were performed on all included trials. The statistical power of the effects size for each RCT study was assessed using sample size calculation equations.
(1) A total of 207 RCTs were included, including 111 superiority trials and 96 non-inferiority trials. (2) Among the 111 superiority trials, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycosylated hemoglobin HbA1c (HbA1c) outcome measure were reported in 9% and 12% of the RCTs respectively with the sample size > 150 in each trial. For the outcome of HbA1c, only 10% of the RCTs had more than 80% power. For FPG, 23% of the RCTs had more than 80% power. (3) In the 96 non-inferiority trials, the outcomes FPG and HbA1c were reported as 31% and 36% respectively. These RCTs had a samples size > 150. For HbA1c only 36% of the RCTs had more than 80% power. For FPG, only 27% of the studies had more than 80% power.
The sample size for statistical analysis was distressingly low and most RCTs did not achieve 80% power. In order to obtain a sufficient statistic power, it is recommended that clinical trials should establish clear research objective and hypothesis first, and choose scientific and evidence-based study design and outcome measurements. At the same time, calculate required sample size to ensure a precise research conclusion.
探讨在使用中药治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的随机对照试验(RCT)中,效应量的检验效能是否基于足够的样本量。
在中国知网(CNKI)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和万方数据中,系统检索了使用“消渴”或糖尿病、中草药、中成药、中药、随机、对照、盲法和安慰剂对照等关键词的文献。为了确定结局评估信息和样本量,将干预疗程限制为≥3个月。根据CONSORT声明中的核对清单制作数据收集表。对所有纳入的试验进行独立的双人数据提取。使用样本量计算方程评估每个RCT研究的效应量的统计检验效能。
(1)共纳入207项RCT,其中包括111项优效性试验和96项非劣效性试验。(2)在111项优效性试验中,分别有9%和12%的RCT报告了空腹血糖(FPG)和糖化血红蛋白HbA1c(HbA1c)结局测量,每项试验的样本量>150。对于HbA1c结局,只有10%的RCT检验效能超过80%。对于FPG,23%的RCT检验效能超过80%。(3)在96项非劣效性试验中,FPG和HbA1c结局的报告率分别为31%和36%。这些RCT的样本量>150。对于HbA1c,只有36%的RCT检验效能超过80%。对于FPG,只有27%的研究检验效能超过80%。
用于统计分析的样本量低得令人担忧,大多数RCT未达到80%的检验效能。为了获得足够的统计检验效能,建议临床试验应首先明确研究目标和假设,并选择科学且基于证据的研究设计和结局测量方法。同时,计算所需的样本量以确保得出精确的研究结论。