DiVeta S K, Speece D L
Department of Special Education, University of Maryland, College Park 20742.
J Learn Disabil. 1990 Nov;23(9):579-82. doi: 10.1177/002221949002300909.
Blending and spelling training were compared in this experiment to determine which intervention would improve the decoding skills of two first-grade boys with learning disabilities who were in the phonetic cue stage of reading. Additionally, the two boys received pre- and posttest administrations of a phonemic segmentation task. Although neither intervention proved superior, the children met the learning criterion for both interventions and demonstrated both maintenance and generalization of their skills. They also improved their phonemic skills, even though independent training in this area was not provided. It appeared that the equivalence of the interventions may have been due to the intensive instructional setting and use of systematic error analysis procedures.
在本实验中,对混合训练和拼写训练进行了比较,以确定哪种干预措施能提高两名处于阅读语音线索阶段的一年级学习障碍男孩的解码技能。此外,这两名男孩接受了音素分割任务的前测和后测。虽然没有一种干预措施被证明更具优势,但孩子们达到了两种干预措施的学习标准,并展示了他们技能的保持和泛化。他们的音素技能也有所提高,尽管在这方面没有提供独立训练。似乎干预措施的等效性可能是由于强化教学环境和系统错误分析程序的使用。