• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受氟尿嘧啶联合放线菌素D治疗的耐药性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者。

Resistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients treated with 5-fluorouracil plus actinomycin D.

作者信息

Manopunya Manatsawee, Suprasert Prapaporn

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(1):387-90. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.1.387.

DOI:10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.1.387
PMID:22502707
Abstract

A combination of 5-fluorouracil plus actinomycin D (5FU plus Act D) is the regimen that has been commonly administered to Chinese and Japanese gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients as the first or second line of treatment with an excellent outcome. However, the efficacy of this regimen in a salvage setting was unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 5 FU plus Act D regimen utilized in this condition, all GTN patients resistant to at least three previous chemotherapy regimens who received the 5 FU plus Act D regimen between August 2009 and January 2011 at Chiang Mai University Hospital were reviewed. There were five cases who met the criteria. Four of those patients were in FIGO stage III to IV with a WHO scoring of more than 12. The median number of cycles for each patient was two and only one case achieved remission while four of the cases were unresponsive. The toxicity was evaluated in 12 cycles. Common complications were uncomplicated myelosuppression and mucositis. In conclusion, this regimen revealed modest efficacy in a salvage setting with manageable toxicity.

摘要

5-氟尿嘧啶联合放线菌素D(5FU联合Act D)方案一直是中国和日本妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者常用的一线或二线治疗方案,疗效良好。然而,该方案在挽救性治疗中的疗效尚不清楚。为了评估5FU联合Act D方案在此种情况下的疗效和安全性,我们回顾了2009年8月至2011年1月期间在清迈大学医院接受5FU联合Act D方案治疗、对至少三种先前化疗方案耐药的所有妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)患者。有5例患者符合标准。其中4例患者为FIGO III至IV期,WHO评分超过12分。每位患者的中位化疗周期数为2个,只有1例患者达到缓解,4例患者无反应。在12个周期中评估了毒性。常见并发症为无并发症的骨髓抑制和粘膜炎。总之,该方案在挽救性治疗中显示出一定疗效,毒性可控。

相似文献

1
Resistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients treated with 5-fluorouracil plus actinomycin D.接受氟尿嘧啶联合放线菌素D治疗的耐药性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(1):387-90. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.1.387.
2
Comparison of MACT and 5Fu+ACT-D chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.MACT与5Fu+放线菌素D化疗方案治疗低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的比较。
J Chemother. 2016 Apr;28(2):135-9. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2015.1136778. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
3
[EMA/CO regimen for chemotherapy 24 patients with ultra high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia].[EMA/CO化疗方案治疗24例超高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 25;53(6):371-376. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.06.003.
4
Treatment of extremely high risk and resistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.朱拉隆功国王纪念医院对极高风险及耐药性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者的治疗。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(2):925-8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.2.925.
5
Relapsed or refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia treated with the etoposide and cisplatin/etoposide, methotrexate, and actinomycin D (EP-EMA) regimen.采用依托泊苷和顺铂/依托泊苷、甲氨蝶呤及放线菌素D(EP-EMA)方案治疗的复发性或难治性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Jul;98(1):44-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.03.037. Epub 2007 May 3.
6
Etoposide-Actinomycin as Salvage Regimen for the Treatment of Nonmetastatic and Low-Risk Metastatic Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: Experience at the Philippine General Hospital.依托泊苷-放线菌素作为挽救方案治疗非转移性和低风险转移性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤:菲律宾总医院的经验
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Jun;26(5):977-83. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000685.
7
Salvage combination chemotherapy with floxuridine, dactinomycin, etoposide, and vincristine (FAEV) for patients with relapsed/chemoresistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.对于复发/耐药性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者,采用氟尿嘧啶、放线菌素 D、依托泊苷和长春新碱(FAEV)进行挽救性联合化疗。
Ann Oncol. 2011 Jul;22(7):1588-1594. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq649. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
8
EP-EMA regimen (etoposide and cisplatin with etoposide, methotrexate, and dactinomycin) in a series of 18 women with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.EP-EMA 方案(依托泊苷和顺铂联合依托泊苷、甲氨蝶呤和多柔比星)治疗 18 例妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Jun;22(5):875-80. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31824d834d.
9
Cyclophosphamide, hydroxyurea, actinomycin D, methotrexate, and vincristine in the treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.环磷酰胺、羟基脲、放线菌素D、甲氨蝶呤和长春新碱用于治疗妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Mar;25(3):498-503. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000383.
10
Actinomycin D, cisplatin, and etoposide regimen is associated with almost universal cure in patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.放线菌素 D、顺铂和依托泊苷方案与高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者的几乎普遍治愈相关。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Aug;50(12):2082-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Uterine artery embolization combined with local infusion of methotrexate and 5- fluorouracil in treating ectopic pregnancy: A CONSORT-compliant article.子宫动脉栓塞联合甲氨蝶呤及5-氟尿嘧啶局部灌注治疗异位妊娠:一篇遵循CONSORT声明的文章
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(5):e9722. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009722.
2
Chemotherapy for resistant or recurrent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.耐药或复发性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 13;2016(1):CD008891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008891.pub3.
3
FIGO stage IV gestational choriocarcinoma misdiagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis: A case report.
FIGO 分期为 IV 期的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤误诊为肺结核:一例报告。
Oncol Lett. 2015 Sep;10(3):1924-1926. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3443. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
4
Tegafur Substitution for 5-Fu in Combination with Actinomycin D to Treat Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm.替加氟替代5-氟尿嘧啶联合放线菌素D治疗妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0143531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143531. eCollection 2015.
5
Management of Chemoresistant and Quiescent Gestational Trophoblastic Disease.化疗耐药及静止期妊娠滋养细胞疾病的管理
Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2014 Jan 4;3(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s13669-013-0071-6. eCollection 2014.