• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在经济自由与社会政策原则之间寻求平衡:欧盟竞争法与国家卫生系统。

Balancing economic freedom against social policy principles: EC competition law and national health systems.

机构信息

LSE Health, LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2012 Jul;106(2):127-37. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.03.008
PMID:22502932
Abstract

EU Health policy exemplifies the philosophical tension between EC economic freedoms and social policy. EC competition law, like other internal market rules, could restrict national health policy options despite the subsidiarity principle. In particular, European health system reforms that incorporate elements of market competition may trigger the application of competition rules if non-economic gains in consumer welfare are not adequately accounted for. This article defines the policy and legal parameters of the debate between competition law and health policy. Using a sample of cases it analyses how the ECJ, national courts, and National Competition Authorities have applied competition laws to the health services sector in different circumstances and in different ways. It concludes by considering the implications of the convergence of recent trends in competition law enforcement and health system market reforms.

摘要

欧盟卫生政策体现了欧共体经济自由与社会政策之间的哲学性紧张关系。尽管存在辅助原则,但欧共体竞争法与其他内部市场规则一样,可能会限制国家卫生政策的选择。具体而言,如果消费者福利的非经济收益没有得到充分考虑,纳入市场竞争要素的欧洲卫生系统改革可能会引发竞争规则的适用。本文界定了竞争法与卫生政策之间辩论的政策和法律参数。通过案例样本,分析了欧洲法院、国家法院和国家竞争管理机构在不同情况下以不同方式将竞争法适用于卫生服务部门的情况。最后,本文考虑了竞争法执行和卫生系统市场改革这两个最近趋势趋同的影响。

相似文献

1
Balancing economic freedom against social policy principles: EC competition law and national health systems.在经济自由与社会政策原则之间寻求平衡:欧盟竞争法与国家卫生系统。
Health Policy. 2012 Jul;106(2):127-37. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
2
Introducing competition principles into health care through EU law and policy: a case study of the Netherlands.通过欧盟法律和政策将竞争原则引入医疗保健领域:以荷兰为例
Med Law Rev. 2014 Spring;22(2):238-54. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwu008.
3
Competition rules and health care players: principles and consequences.竞争规则与医疗保健参与者:原则与后果
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2012;25(5):379-86. doi: 10.1108/09526861211235883.
4
[Economics and ethics in public health?].[公共卫生中的经济学与伦理学?]
Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Jan;61(1):1-7.
5
The crisis as catalyst for reframing health care policies in the European Union.危机成为欧盟重塑医疗保健政策的催化剂。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2015 Jan;10(1):45-59. doi: 10.1017/S1744133114000231.
6
Intellectual origins and principles of the internal market in New Zealand.新西兰国内市场的知识起源与原则
N Z Med J. 2000 Mar 24;113(1106):101-4.
7
Evaluating mental health care and policy in Spain.评估西班牙的精神卫生保健与政策。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010 Jun;13(2):73-86.
8
Managed competition in The Netherlands: lessons from five years of health care reform.荷兰的管理式竞争:五年医疗改革的经验教训
Aust Health Rev. 1995;18(1):9-27.
9
Crossing borders: a critical review of the role of the European Court of Justice in EU health policy.跨越边界:对欧盟法院在欧盟卫生政策中作用的批判性回顾。
Health Policy. 2012 Apr;105(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
10
[The Polish healthcare system: perspectives and possibilities for adoption of healthcare systems from other countries of the European Union].[波兰医疗体系:采用欧盟其他国家医疗体系的前景与可能性]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2010;56(3):131-43.

引用本文的文献

1
Commercial Health Care Financing: The Cause of U.S., Dutch, and Swiss Health Systems Inefficiency?商业性医疗保健融资:美国、荷兰和瑞士卫生系统效率低下的原因?
Int J Health Serv. 2019 Jul;49(3):431-456. doi: 10.1177/0020731419847113. Epub 2019 May 8.
2
"Managed competition" for Ireland? The single versus multiple payer debate.爱尔兰的“管理式竞争”?单一支付者与多支付者之争。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 26;14:442. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-442.