Suppr超能文献

CHADS2 评分在评估接受直流电复律的心房颤动患者血栓栓塞风险和死亡率中的作用(来自 ACUTE 试验亚研究)。

Role of CHADS2 score in evaluation of thromboembolic risk and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing direct current cardioversion (from the ACUTE Trial Substudy).

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jul 15;110(2):222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.03.017. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

Abstract

The CHADS(2) (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischemic attack [2 points]) scoring scheme has been found to be a good predictor of stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the value of the CHADS(2) scoring system in the risk stratification of patients with AF who undergo direct-current cardioversion has not yet been specifically investigated. In this study, a subgroup of 541 patients from the Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) study who had AF for >48 hours and planned to undergo transesophageal echocardiography before direct-current cardioversion were enrolled. Each patient had a CHADS(2) score calculated. Of the patients with CHADS(2) scores of 0, 14 (10%) were found to have left atrial appendage thrombi on transesophageal echocardiography. After 6 months of follow up, patients with CHADS(2) scores of 3 to 6 showed a significantly higher mortality rate in comparison with patients with lower CHADS(2) scores (4.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.004), despite their similar prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus and stroke (thrombus: 13.4% vs 11.6%, p = 0.60; stroke: 0% vs 0.3%, p = 0.70). In conclusion, the CHADS(2) scoring system may be useful for predicting short-term mortality risk in patients with AF receiving elective direct-current cardioversion. However, in the preprocedural risk assessment of these patients, the CHADS(2) scoring system is not reliable in predicting risk for left atrial appendage thrombus formation, especially in patients with low CHADS(2) scores.

摘要

CHADS₂(充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄>75 岁、糖尿病、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作[2 分])评分方案已被发现是预测非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者中风风险的良好指标。然而,CHADS₂评分系统在接受直流电复律的 AF 患者风险分层中的价值尚未得到专门研究。在这项研究中,从评估经食管超声心动图(ACUTE)研究中选择了 541 名 AF 持续>48 小时并计划在直流电复律前进行经食管超声心动图检查的患者亚组。为每位患者计算了 CHADS₂评分。在 CHADS₂评分为 0 的患者中,有 14 例(10%)经经食管超声心动图检查发现左心耳血栓。在 6 个月的随访中,CHADS₂评分在 3 至 6 分的患者死亡率明显高于 CHADS₂评分较低的患者(4.3%对 0.5%,p=0.004),尽管他们的左心耳血栓和中风发生率相似(血栓:13.4%对 11.6%,p=0.60;中风:0%对 0.3%,p=0.70)。总之,CHADS₂评分系统可用于预测接受择期直流电复律的 AF 患者的短期死亡率风险。然而,在这些患者的术前风险评估中,CHADS₂评分系统在预测左心耳血栓形成风险方面并不可靠,尤其是在 CHADS₂评分较低的患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验