• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜胆胰转流十二指肠转位学习曲线的多因素分析。

Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.

机构信息

Duke University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):940-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824c1d06.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824c1d06
PMID:22504193
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of surgeon, patient, and case-specific factors on the learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (RA-LBPD/DS).

BACKGROUND

The BPD/DS has better resolution of diabetes and hypercholesterolemia, and the best long-term weight loss compared to the laparoscopic gastric band or the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Despite excellent results, the BPD/DS is least commonly performed because of greater malabsorption, longer operative duration, and higher technical complication rates. A reduction in technical complications and operative duration will enable the BPD/DS to be offered more frequently.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (N = 120) undergoing RA-LBPD/DS between October 2000 and August 2008 were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to determine the influence of surgeon and patient factors on complications and operative duration. Independent variables were case number, age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, difficult anatomy, and need for extensive adhesiolysis. Dependent variables were complications (leaks, bleeding, and conversion) and operative duration. The best-fit model predicted the risk factors for complications, and a risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis estimated the learning curve.

RESULTS

: Operative duration decreased an average of 3 minutes with each successive case (P < 0.001, R² = 0.63) and with patient's female gender. Adhesiolysis, difficult anatomy, liver biopsy, and higher ASA score increased operative duration. The incidence of high blood loss (13.3%), conversion (2.2%), and leaks (5.8%) were experienced by a total of 22 patients (18.3%). There was no mortality. Complications declined after 50 cases and were strongly predicted by increasing surgeon case number.

CONCLUSIONS

The learning curve for the RA-LBPD/DS is 50 cases. Risk factors influencing outcomes were identified.

摘要

目的

评估外科医生、患者和病例特定因素对机器人辅助腹腔镜胆胰分流术与十二指肠转位(RA-LBPD/DS)学习曲线的影响。

背景

与腹腔镜胃带或 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术相比,BPD/DS 对糖尿病和高胆固醇血症的治疗效果更好,长期减肥效果最佳。尽管效果很好,但由于吸收不良更多、手术时间更长和技术并发症发生率更高,BPD/DS 的实施最少。减少技术并发症和手术时间将使 BPD/DS 更频繁地实施。

方法

对 2000 年 10 月至 2008 年 8 月期间连续接受 RA-LBPD/DS 手术的 120 例患者进行分析,采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析确定外科医生和患者因素对并发症和手术时间的影响。自变量为手术例数、年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、困难解剖结构和广泛粘连松解的需要。因变量为并发症(渗漏、出血和转换)和手术时间。最佳拟合模型预测并发症的危险因素,并进行风险调整累积和分析估计学习曲线。

结果

手术时间平均每例减少 3 分钟(P < 0.001,R² = 0.63),与患者的女性性别有关。粘连松解、困难解剖、肝活检和更高的 ASA 评分增加了手术时间。共有 22 例(18.3%)患者发生大出血(13.3%)、转换(2.2%)和渗漏(5.8%)。无死亡病例。并发症在 50 例后下降,并且强烈受到外科医生手术例数增加的预测。

结论

RA-LBPD/DS 的学习曲线为 50 例。确定了影响结果的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.机器人辅助腹腔镜胆胰转流十二指肠转位学习曲线的多因素分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):940-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824c1d06.
2
Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: retrospective study from two institutions with preliminary results.胃束带术失败后行胆胰转流十二指肠转位术或胃旁路术:来自两家机构的回顾性研究及初步结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Sep-Oct;3(5):521-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.07.001.
3
Laparoscopic conversion of failed gastric bypass to duodenal switch: technical considerations and preliminary outcomes.腹腔镜下将失败的胃旁路手术转换为十二指肠转位术:技术要点及初步结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Nov-Dec;3(6):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
4
Roux-en-Y divided gastric bypass results in the same weight loss as duodenal switch for morbid obesity.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术在治疗病态肥胖方面导致的体重减轻与十二指肠转位术相同。
Am J Surg. 2004 May;187(5):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.001.
5
Venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: analysis of 362 patients.腹腔镜胆胰转流十二指肠转位术后的静脉血栓栓塞:362例患者分析
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 May-Jun;10(3):469-73. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
6
Is biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch a solution for patients after laparoscopic gastric banding failure?胃旁路术联合十二指肠转位术是否为腹腔镜胃束带松解术失败患者的解决方案?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
7
Superobese and super-superobese patients: 2-step laparoscopic duodenal switch.超级肥胖和超超级肥胖患者:两步法腹腔镜十二指肠转流术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 Nov-Dec;7(6):703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Sep 17.
8
Comparison of rates of resolution of diabetes mellitus after gastric banding, gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion.胃束带术、胃旁路术和胆胰转流术后糖尿病缓解率的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Nov;205(5):631-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.033. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
9
Is laparoscopic single-stage biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch safe in super morbidly obese patients?对于超级肥胖患者,腹腔镜单阶段胆胰转流并十二指肠转位术是否安全?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 May-Jun;10(3):427-30. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
10
Does preoperative diabetes mellitus affect weight loss outcome after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch?术前糖尿病是否会影响胆胰转流十二指肠转位术后的体重减轻效果?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;11(6):1295-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the surgeon's learning curve impact pentafecta outcomes in radical prostatectomy? a systematic review and meta-analysis.外科医生的学习曲线是否会影响根治性前列腺切除术的五项完美指标结果?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2025 May 7;25(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01810-x.
2
Learning curves for adoption of robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review of safety, efficiency and clinical outcomes.采用机器人减重手术的学习曲线:安全性、效率和临床结果的系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Sep 26;18(1):349. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02100-8.
3
Analysis of the Impact of the Learning Curve on the Safety Outcome of the Totally Robotic-Assisted Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch: a Single-Institution Observational Study.
分析学习曲线对全机器人辅助胆胰转流十二指肠转位术安全性结果的影响:单中心观察研究。
Obes Surg. 2023 Sep;33(9):2742-2748. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06719-8. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Learning Curves in Pediatric Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty: A Systematic Review.小儿机器人辅助肾盂成形术的学习曲线:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 24;11(23):6935. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236935.
5
Evaluation of the learning curve for robotic single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy.机器人辅助单吻合十二指肠-回肠旁路术联合袖状胃切除术学习曲线的评估
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 22;9:969418. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.969418. eCollection 2022.
6
Robotic bariatric surgery for the obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人减重手术治疗肥胖症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2440-2456. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08283-z. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
7
A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.机器人手术学习曲线的系统评价:范围和异质性。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):353-365. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6473-9. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
How to Switch to the Switch: Implementation of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch into Practice.如何转向“转向术”:十二指肠转位的胆胰转流术在实践中的应用
Obes Surg. 2017 Sep;27(9):2506-2509. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2801-8.
9
SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SINGLE ANASTOMOSIS DUODENAL SWITCH PROCEDURE: PRELIMINARY RESULT FROM A SINGLE INSTITUTION.单吻合十二指肠转位手术的安全性和有效性:来自单一机构的初步结果。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016;29Suppl 1(Suppl 1):80-84. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201600S10020.
10
Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass: time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice.腹腔镜胃旁路手术到机器人辅助胃旁路手术:学术性外科实践培训和转型所涉及的时间和成本投入。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Jun;10(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0567-y. Epub 2016 Mar 16.