• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术病房危害的系统主动风险评估:一项定量研究。

A systematic proactive risk assessment of hazards in surgical wards: a quantitative study.

机构信息

Clinical Safety Research Unit, Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2012 Jun;255(6):1086-92. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f5f36.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f5f36
PMID:22504280
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify and prioritize hazards in surgical wards and recommend interventions.

BACKGROUND

Retrospective and prospective studies report the frequency and severity of surgical adverse events, but not in sufficient detail to allow interventions to be recommended in surgical wards.

METHODS

Seventy hours of observations were used to record all activities occurring in surgical wards, and from these activities health care processes were derived. Fifty-nine patients and staff quantified the hazard associated with each health care process through a risk assessment survey. Modified health care failure mode and effects analysis was applied to the most hazardous of these processes to quantify the hazard of their associated failures. Cause analysis was applied to the most hazardous failures within analyzed processes. Interventions addressing the prioritized failures were recommended.

RESULTS

Surgical ward observations identified 81 activities. The risk assessment survey was used to quantify the hazard associated with 10 health care processes derived from these activities. The 5 most hazardous processes were prioritized for modified health care failure mode and effects analysis including hand hygiene, isolation of infection, vital signs, medication delivery, and hand off. Of 190 failures within these processes, 50 (26%) were considered hazardous and did not have effective control measures in place. The causes of these failures allowed interventions to be recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Proactive risk assessments were used to systematically identify and prioritize hazards in surgical wards and allowed interventions to be recommended. These are practical tools that can determine where patient safety efforts should be targeted in clinical health care environments.

摘要

目的

识别和确定外科病房的危害,并提出干预措施。

背景

回顾性和前瞻性研究报告了外科不良事件的频率和严重程度,但没有详细到足以推荐外科病房干预措施的程度。

方法

使用 70 小时的观察记录外科病房中发生的所有活动,并从这些活动中推导出医疗保健流程。59 名患者和工作人员通过风险评估调查对每个医疗保健流程相关的危害进行量化。对这些流程中最危险的流程应用改良医疗保健失效模式和效果分析,以量化相关失效的危害。对分析流程中最危险的失效进行原因分析。针对优先考虑的失效推荐干预措施。

结果

外科病房观察共确定 81 项活动。风险评估调查用于量化从这些活动中推导出的 10 个医疗保健流程相关的危害。5 个最危险的流程被确定为改良医疗保健失效模式和效果分析的优先级,包括手卫生、感染隔离、生命体征、药物输送和交接。在这些流程中,190 个失效中有 50 个(26%)被认为是危险的,并且没有有效的控制措施。这些失效的原因允许提出干预措施。

结论

前瞻性风险评估被用于系统地识别和确定外科病房的危害,并提出干预措施。这些实用工具可以确定患者安全工作应在临床医疗保健环境中的哪些方面进行重点关注。

相似文献

1
A systematic proactive risk assessment of hazards in surgical wards: a quantitative study.手术病房危害的系统主动风险评估:一项定量研究。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jun;255(6):1086-92. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f5f36.
2
An observational study of the frequency, severity, and etiology of failures in postoperative care after major elective general surgery.一项关于大型择期普通外科手术后术后护理失败的频率、严重程度和病因的观察性研究。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826d859b.
3
Escalation of care in surgery: a systematic risk assessment to prevent avoidable harm in hospitalized patients.外科护理升级:一项预防住院患者可避免伤害的系统风险评估
Ann Surg. 2015 May;261(5):831-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000762.
4
A systematic quantitative assessment of risks associated with poor communication in surgical care.外科护理中沟通不畅相关风险的系统定量评估。
Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;145(6):582-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.105.
5
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
6
Use of a systematic risk analysis method to improve safety in the production of paediatric parenteral nutrition solutions.使用系统风险分析方法提高儿科肠外营养制剂生产的安全性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Apr;14(2):93-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.007914.
7
Patient safety in developing countries: retrospective estimation of scale and nature of harm to patients in hospital.发展中国家的患者安全:对医院患者伤害的规模和性质的回顾性估计。
BMJ. 2012 Mar 13;344:e832. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e832.
8
An evaluation of information transfer through the continuum of surgical care: a feasibility study.手术护理连续体中信息传递的评估:一项可行性研究。
Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):402-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e986df.
9
Toward safer care: reporting systems, checklists and process standardization.迈向更安全的医疗:报告系统、检查表与流程标准化。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2011;77:b123.
10
Failure mode and effects analysis: too little for too much?失效模式与影响分析:做得太少?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):607-11. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000723. Epub 2012 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient handoffs and multi-specialty trainee perspectives across an institution: informing recommendations for health systems and an expanded conceptual framework for handoffs.医疗机构中的患者交接和多专科受训者视角:为卫生系统提供建议并扩展交接的概念框架。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 13;23(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04355-5.
2
Awareness of Hazard Risks and Prevention Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents in South East Nigeria.尼日利亚东南部骨科手术住院医师对危险风险的认知与预防
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2022 Jan-Mar;12(1):11-16. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_85_22. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
3
Evaluating Surgical Risk Using FMEA and MULTIMOORA Methods under a Single-Valued Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Environment.
在单值梯形 neutrosophic 环境下使用 FMEA 和 MULTIMOORA 方法评估手术风险
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Jul 23;13:865-881. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S243331. eCollection 2020.
4
Prospective methods for identifying perioperative risk-assessment methods for patient safety over 20 years: a systematic review.前瞻性方法识别 20 多年来患者安全的围手术期风险评估方法:系统评价。
BJS Open. 2020 Apr;4(2):197-205. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50246. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
5
Clinical observations and a ealthcare ailure ode and ffect nalysis to identify vulnerabilities in the security and accounting of medications in Ontario hospitals: a study protocol.临床观察与医疗保健失效模式及效应分析:识别安大略省医院药物安全与计费漏洞的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 29;9(6):e027629. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027629.
6
Risk assessment of the emergency processes: Healthcare failure mode and effect analysis.应急流程的风险评估:医疗失效模式与效应分析。
World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(2):97-105. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.02.003.
7
Risk Assessment of Using Entonox for the Relief of Labor Pain: A Healthcare Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Approach.使用恩托诺克斯缓解分娩疼痛的风险评估:一种医疗保健失效模式与效应分析方法。
Electron Physician. 2016 Mar 25;8(3):2150-9. doi: 10.19082/2150. eCollection 2016 Mar.
8
Preventable Adverse Events in Surgical Care in Sweden: A Nationwide Review of Patient Notes.瑞典外科护理中可预防的不良事件:对患者病历的全国性回顾。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(11):e3047. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003047.
9
Risk Assessment of Drug Management Process in Women Surgery Department of Qaem Educational Hospital (QEH) Using HFMEA Method (2013).运用医疗失效模式与效应分析方法(2013年)对卡姆教育医院(QEH)女性外科药物管理流程进行风险评估
Iran J Pharm Res. 2015 Spring;14(2):495-504.
10
Application of failure mode and effect analysis in laparoscopic colon surgery training.失效模式与效应分析在腹腔镜结肠手术培训中的应用
World J Surg. 2015 Feb;39(2):536-42. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2827-1.