• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科护理中沟通不畅相关风险的系统定量评估。

A systematic quantitative assessment of risks associated with poor communication in surgical care.

作者信息

Nagpal Kamal, Vats Amit, Ahmed Kamran, Smith Andrea B, Sevdalis Nick, Jonannsson Helgi, Vincent Charles, Moorthy Krishna

机构信息

Clinical Safety Research Unit, Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, 10th Floor, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Building, St Mary's Hospital, South Wharf Road, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;145(6):582-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.105.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.2010.105
PMID:20566980
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

Health care failure mode and effect analysis identifies critical processes prone to information transfer and communication failures and suggests interventions to improve these failures.

DESIGN

Failure mode and effect analysis.

SETTING

Academic research.

PARTICIPANTS

A multidisciplinary team consisting of surgeons, anesthetists, nurses, and a psychologist involved in various phases of surgical care was assembled.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A flowchart of the whole process was developed. Potential failure modes were identified and evaluated using a hazard matrix score. Recommendations were determined for certain critical failure modes using a decision tree.

RESULTS

The process of surgical care was divided into the following 4 main phases: preoperative assessment and optimization, preprocedural teamwork, postoperative handover, and daily ward care. Most failure modes were identified in the preoperative assessment and optimization phase. Forty-one of 132 failures were classified as critical, 26 of which were sufficiently covered by current protocols. Recommendations were made for the remaining 15 failure modes.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified health care failure mode and effect analysis proved to be a practical approach and has been well received by clinicians. Systematic analysis by a multidisciplinary team is a useful method for detecting failure modes.

摘要

假设

医疗保健失效模式与效应分析可识别出易于出现信息传递和沟通失败的关键流程,并提出改善这些失败情况的干预措施。

设计

失效模式与效应分析。

背景

学术研究。

参与者

组建了一个多学科团队,成员包括参与手术护理各个阶段的外科医生、麻醉师、护士和一名心理学家。

主要观察指标

绘制了整个过程的流程图。使用风险矩阵评分法识别并评估潜在的失效模式。针对某些关键失效模式,使用决策树确定建议措施。

结果

手术护理过程分为以下4个主要阶段:术前评估与优化、术前团队协作、术后交接以及日常病房护理。大多数失效模式在术前评估与优化阶段被识别出来。132例失败中有41例被归类为关键失败,其中26例已被现行方案充分涵盖。针对其余15种失效模式提出了建议措施。

结论

改良后的医疗保健失效模式与效应分析被证明是一种实用方法,并受到临床医生的广泛认可。多学科团队进行的系统分析是检测失效模式的有效方法。

相似文献

1
A systematic quantitative assessment of risks associated with poor communication in surgical care.外科护理中沟通不畅相关风险的系统定量评估。
Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;145(6):582-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.105.
2
An evaluation of information transfer through the continuum of surgical care: a feasibility study.手术护理连续体中信息传递的评估:一项可行性研究。
Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):402-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e986df.
3
Health Care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: a useful proactive risk analysis in a pediatric oncology ward.医疗保健失效模式与效应分析:儿科肿瘤病房中一种有用的前瞻性风险分析方法
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Feb;15(1):58-63. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014902.
4
Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality.从外科手术到重症监护的患者交接:运用一级方程式赛车维修站和航空模式提高安全性与质量。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 May;17(5):470-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02239.x.
5
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
6
Patient safety and quality in surgery.手术中的患者安全与质量。
Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Aug;87(4):867-81, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.06.001.
7
Identifying methods to improve heart surgery: an operative approach and strategy for implementation on an organizational level.确定改善心脏手术的方法:一种在组织层面实施的手术方法和策略。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Nov;34(5):1027-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
8
Improving measurement in clinical handover.改善临床交接班中的信息传递。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Aug;18(4):272-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024570.
9
Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects.手术室中的沟通失误:复发性类型及影响的观察性分类
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):330-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.330.
10
[Application of a pro-active method of risk analysis in communication among health personnel in an Italian medicine ward].
Ann Ig. 2009 Sep-Oct;21(5):423-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Position Statement of ISCCM on Intrahospital Transport of Critically Ill Patients.国际危重症护理医学学会关于危重症患者院内转运的立场声明
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025 Apr;29(4):291-300. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24939.
2
Surgery and Anesthesia Preoperative "Virtual Huddle": A Pilot Trial to Enhance Communication across the Drape.手术和麻醉术前“虚拟碰头会”:一项增强隔帘后沟通的试点研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):772-778. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772687. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
3
Patient focused interventions and communication in the surgical clinic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
外科诊所中以患者为中心的干预措施与沟通:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Mar 10;57:101893. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101893. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Prospective risk assessments of patient safety events related to drug shortages in hospitals: Three actor-level perspectives.医院药品短缺相关患者安全事件的前瞻性风险评估:三个行为主体层面的视角
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2021 Aug 5;3:100055. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100055. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Interventions to improve ergonomics in the operating theatre: A systematic review of ergonomics training and intra-operative microbreaks.改善手术室人体工程学的干预措施:人体工程学培训与术中微休息的系统评价
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Apr 2;55:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.02.008. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
Prospective methods for identifying perioperative risk-assessment methods for patient safety over 20 years: a systematic review.前瞻性方法识别 20 多年来患者安全的围手术期风险评估方法:系统评价。
BJS Open. 2020 Apr;4(2):197-205. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50246. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
7
Psychometric properties of an instrument measuring communication within and between the professional groups licensed practical nurses and registered nurses in anaesthetic clinics.测量麻醉诊室内外执业护士(注册护士和执业护士)之间沟通的工具的心理测量学特性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 10;19(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4805-7.
8
Discordance in Information Exchange Between Providers During Care Transitions for Surgical Patients.手术患者在交接护理过程中,医护人员之间的信息交流存在差异。
J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.049. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
9
Why Families Get Angry: Practical Strategies for Clinical Ethics Consultants to Rebuild Trust Between Angry Families and Clinicians in the Critical Care Environment.家庭为何愤怒:临床伦理顾问在重症监护环境中重建愤怒家庭与临床医生之间信任的实用策略。
HEC Forum. 2019 Sep;31(3):201-217. doi: 10.1007/s10730-019-09370-y.
10
How does training in anesthesia residency shape residents' approaches to patient care handoffs? A single-center qualitative interview study.麻醉住院医师培训如何塑造住院医师对患者交接的处理方式?一项单中心定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1387-8.