Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Dent. 2012 Jul;40(7):603-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
The aim of this study was to assess a two-dimensional method to monitor occlusal tooth wear quantitatively using a commercially available ordinary flatbed scanner.
A flatbed scanner, measuring software and gypsum casts were used. In Part I, two observers (A and B) independently traced scans of marked wear facets of ten sets of casts in two sessions (test and retest). In Part II, three other sets of casts were duplicated and two observers (C and D) marked wear facets and traced the scanned images independently. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was determined comparing measured values (mm(2)) in paired T-tests. Duplicate measurement errors (DME) were calculated.
In Part I the test and retest values (10 casts, 218 teeth) of observer A and B did not differ significantly (A: p = 0.289; B: p = 0.666); correlation coefficients were 0.998 (A) and 0.999 (B). "Tracing wear facets" showed a DME of 0.30 mm(2) for observer A and 0.15 mm(2) for observer B. In Part II, assessment of 70 teeth resulted in correlation coefficients of 0.994 for observer C and 0.997 for observer D; no differences between test and retest values were found for C (p = 0.061), although D differed significantly (p = 0.000). The DME for "marking and tracing wear facets" was 0.39 mm(2) (C) and 0.27 mm(2) (D). DME for inter-observer agreement were 0.45 mm(2) (test) and 0.42 mm(2) (re-test).
We conclude that marking and tracing of occlusal wear facets to assess occlusal tooth wear quantitatively can be done accurately and reproducibly.
本研究旨在评估一种二维方法,使用市售普通平板扫描仪定量监测咬合面牙齿磨损。
使用平板扫描仪、测量软件和石膏模型。在第一部分中,两名观察者(A 和 B)分别在两次(测试和复测)会议中独立追踪标记磨损面的扫描图像。在第二部分中,另外三组模型被复制,两名观察者(C 和 D)独立标记磨损面并追踪扫描图像。配对 T 检验比较测量值(mm²)以确定观察者内和观察者间的一致性。计算重复测量误差(DME)。
在第一部分中,观察者 A 和 B 的测试和复测值(10 组模型,218 颗牙)没有显著差异(A:p = 0.289;B:p = 0.666);相关系数分别为 0.998(A)和 0.999(B)。“追踪磨损面”显示观察者 A 的 DME 为 0.30mm²,观察者 B 的 DME 为 0.15mm²。在第二部分中,对 70 颗牙齿的评估得出观察者 C 和 D 的相关系数分别为 0.994 和 0.997;C 组的测试和复测值没有差异(p = 0.061),尽管 D 组差异显著(p = 0.000)。“标记和追踪磨损面”的 DME 分别为 0.39mm²(C)和 0.27mm²(D)。观察者间一致性的 DME 分别为 0.45mm²(测试)和 0.42mm²(复测)。
我们得出结论,标记和追踪咬合面磨损面来定量评估咬合面牙齿磨损可以准确且可重复地进行。