Laboratory of Food Safety and Molecular Biology, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, PR China.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;63(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.03.017. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
With the development of genetically modified crops, there has been a growing interest in available approaches to assess the potential allergenicity of novel gene products. We were not sure whether Cry1C could induce allergy. We examined the protein with three other proteins to determine the potential allergenicity of Cry1C protein from genetically modified rice. Female Brown Norway (BN) rats received 0.1 mg peanut agglutinin (PNA), 1mg potato acid phosphatase (PAP), 1mg ovalbumin (OVA) or 5 mg purified Cry1C protein dissolved in 1 mL water by daily gavage for 42 days to test potential allergenicity. Ten days after the last gavage, rats were orally challenged with antigens, and physiologic and immunologic responses were studied. In contrast to sensitization with PNA, PAP and OVA Cry1C protein did not induce antigen-specific IgG2a in BN rats. Cytokine expression, serum IgE and histamine levels and the number of eosinophils and mast cells in the blood of Cry1C group rats were comparable to the control group rats, which were treated with water alone. As Cry1C did not show any allergenicity, we make the following conclusion that the protein could be safety used in rice or other plants.
随着转基因作物的发展,人们对评估新型基因产物潜在致敏性的可用方法越来越感兴趣。我们不确定 Cry1C 是否会引起过敏。我们用另外三种蛋白来检测 Cry1C 蛋白,以确定来自转基因水稻的 Cry1C 蛋白的潜在致敏性。雌性棕色挪威(BN)大鼠每天通过灌胃接受 0.1mg 花生凝集素(PNA)、1mg 土豆酸性磷酸酶(PAP)、1mg 卵清蛋白(OVA)或 5mg 溶解在 1ml 水中的纯化 Cry1C 蛋白,持续 42 天,以测试潜在的致敏性。最后一次灌胃 10 天后,大鼠口服抗原进行挑战,并研究生理和免疫反应。与用 PNA、PAP 和 OVA 致敏不同,Cry1C 蛋白不会在 BN 大鼠中诱导抗原特异性 IgG2a。与单独用生理盐水处理的对照组大鼠相比,Cry1C 组大鼠的细胞因子表达、血清 IgE 和组胺水平以及血液中的嗜酸性粒细胞和肥大细胞数量没有差异。由于 Cry1C 没有表现出任何致敏性,我们得出以下结论,该蛋白可安全用于水稻或其他植物。