Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Soroka Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012 Oct;47(10):1019-25. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22561. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
To determine whether non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) delivered via nasal prongs can alleviate the need for tracheal intubation and invasive ventilation in infants admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with impending respiratory failure, and to find predictive factors for success or failure with this mode.
A single center retrospective cohort study.
PICU in a university affiliated hospital.
During the 14 months of the study period we recovered 22 NIPPV episodes in 19 infants (median age 65 days) with impending respiratory failure. The patient's respiratory failure etiologies were bronchiolitis (n = 13), pertussis (n = 3), and other respiratory conditions (n = 6).
In 64% of the cases, intubation was prevented and the patients were weaned off to spontaneous breathing (Responders group). 36% failed NIPPV and had to be intubated and invasively ventilated (Non-responders group). Apneic episodes were the indication for ventilation in 11 patients (50%) with a 73% success rate in preventing invasive ventilation. Hypoxemic respiratory failure was present in nine patients (41%) and the rate of success was 44%. Two patients with post extubation respiratory distress, improved with NIPPV. Responders and non-responders did not differ with regard to demographics or disease severity prior to initiation of NIPPV. After initiating NIPPV respiratory rate and the need for sedation were lower in the NIPPV responders.
In a set group of patient population such as infants with apnea secondary to bronchiolitis NIPPV may be successful to reduce the need for invasive ventilation. Our study failed to detect any physiological or clinical markers which could distinguish between so called "responders" and "non-responders" before initiating NIPPV.
确定经鼻插管无创正压通气(NIPPV)是否可以减轻即将发生呼吸衰竭的儿科重症监护病房(PICU)婴儿气管插管和有创通气的需求,并找到这种模式成功或失败的预测因素。
单中心回顾性队列研究。
附属大学医院的 PICU。
在研究期间的 14 个月中,我们从 19 名有即将发生呼吸衰竭的婴儿(中位年龄 65 天)中恢复了 22 例 NIPPV 发作。患者的呼吸衰竭病因是细支气管炎(n=13)、百日咳(n=3)和其他呼吸状况(n=6)。
在 64%的情况下,避免了插管,患者可以脱离呼吸机进行自主呼吸(应答者组)。36%的患者 NIPPV 失败,需要插管和有创通气(非应答者组)。11 名患者(50%)因呼吸暂停发作而需要通气,其中 73%成功预防了有创通气。9 名患者(41%)存在低氧性呼吸衰竭,成功率为 44%。2 名拔管后呼吸窘迫的患者,经 NIPPV 治疗后得到改善。应答者和非应答者在开始 NIPPV 之前的人口统计学或疾病严重程度方面没有差异。在开始 NIPPV 后,呼吸频率和镇静需求在 NIPPV 应答者中较低。
在婴儿等特定患者人群中,如因细支气管炎导致的呼吸暂停,NIPPV 可能成功减少有创通气的需求。我们的研究未能在开始 NIPPV 之前检测到任何可以区分所谓的“应答者”和“非应答者”的生理或临床标志物。