Department of Oral Kinesiology, ACTA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Aug;39(8):576-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02297.x. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
The analysis of microwear patterns, including scratch types and widths, has enabled reconstruction of the dietary habits and lifestyles of prehistoric and modern humans. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine whether an assessment of microwear features of experimental scratches placed on enamel, perpendicularly to the direction of grinding, could predict the grinding direction. Experimental scratches were placed using a scalpel blade on standardised wear facets that had been prepared by wearing opposing enamel surfaces in an electromechanical tooth wear machine. These control 'baseline' facets (with unworn experimental scratches) were subjected to 50 wear cycles, so that differential microwear could be observed on the leading and trailing edges of the 'final' facets. In Group 1 (n=28), the 'footprint' microwear patterns corresponding to the known grinding direction of specimens in the tooth wear machine were identified. Then, they were used to predict the direction of tooth grinding blindly in the same sample after a 2-week intermission period. To avoid overfitting the predictive model, its sensitivity was also cross-validated in a new sample (Group 2, n=14). A crescent-shaped characteristic observed in most experimental scratches matched the grinding direction on all occasions. The best predictor of the direction of grinding was a combined assessment of the leading edge microwear pattern and the crescent characteristic (82.1% in Group 1 and 92.9% in Group 2). In conclusion, a simple scratch test can determine the direction of tooth grinding with high reliability, although further improvement in sensitivity is desirable.
磨痕分析,包括划痕类型和宽度,使重建史前和现代人的饮食习惯和生活方式成为可能。本体外研究的目的是确定评估垂直于研磨方向的实验性划痕的微痕特征是否可以预测研磨方向。使用手术刀刀片在通过电动牙齿磨损机磨损对向牙釉面制备的标准磨损面(带有未磨损的实验性划痕)上放置实验性划痕。这些控制“基线”面(带有未磨损的实验性划痕)经过 50 次磨损循环,以便在“最终”面的前缘和后缘观察到差异微痕。在第 1 组(n=28)中,确定了与牙齿磨损机中标本已知研磨方向相对应的“足迹”微痕模式。然后,在间隔 2 周后,在同一样本中盲目预测牙齿的研磨方向。为避免过度拟合预测模型,在新样本(第 2 组,n=14)中对其敏感性进行了交叉验证。在大多数实验性划痕中观察到的新月形特征在所有情况下都与研磨方向相匹配。研磨方向的最佳预测指标是前缘微痕模式和新月形特征的综合评估(第 1 组为 82.1%,第 2 组为 92.9%)。总之,尽管需要进一步提高敏感性,但简单的划痕测试可以可靠地确定牙齿的研磨方向。