• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过双肾移植优化扩展供体器官:一项病例对照研究。

Optimising expanded donor organs through dual kidney transplantation: a case-control study.

机构信息

Hospital Universitario Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Nefrologia. 2012 May 14;32(3):306-12. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Dec.11173. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

DOI:10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Dec.11173
PMID:22508144
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In order to take full advantage of ECD kidneys, which may not provide sufficient renal mass if used individually, it has been suggested that such organs be used in dual or bilateral kidney transplantation (DTx).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We analysed the experience in a single hospital between May 2007 and March 2011 in a case-control study. Criteria for determining whether to perform single or dual Tx were defined in a protocol in which the biopsy score was important, but not the only factor. Donor's age, medical history, kidney size and creatinine clearance were also considered. During this time period, 80 kidneys from donors over age 65 were transplanted. Single transplants (STx) accounted for 40 of the organs, and another 40 were used in DTx.

RESULTS

Mean donor age for STx was 68.7 ± 3.0 years; for DTx, it was 74.2 ± 4.3 years (P<.001), with more female donors for DTx (75%) than for STx (40%) (P<.001). There were no differences between groups with regard to glomerular filtration rate or proteinuria. Kidneys assigned to DTx received higher biopsy scores than those assigned to STx (2.95 ± 1.01 vs 1.8 ± 1.04; P<.001). DTx recipients were older than STx recipients. There were no differences between the groups regarding cold ischaemia time, delayed graft function, haemorrhagic complications or re-surgeries. However, DTx recipients achieved better creatinine clearance at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, although the difference was only statistically significant at 6 months (53.4 ± 19.5ml/min vs 44.5 ± 15.6ml/min; P<.05). Renal artery thrombosis appeared in 2 STx patients and in both kidneys of 1 DTx patient. Another 2 patients in the DTx group each lost 1 kidney due to thrombosis and ureteral necrosis respectively, but were able to remain dialysis-free. Graft survival at 3 years was 90% for both groups. During the study period 3 patients died (2 in the STx group and 1 in the DTx group).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary experience indicates that DTx provides good results in terms of survival and renal function data, despite surgery being more complicated and the organs having characteristics that probably make them unsuitable for STx. The decision to perform DTx makes using ECD kidneys easier, and it should be based on a combination of pre-transplant histological criteria and the donor's clinical characteristics.

摘要

简介

为了充分利用 ECD 肾脏,如果单独使用,可能无法提供足够的肾脏质量,因此有人建议在双肾或双侧肾移植(DTx)中使用这些器官。

患者和方法

我们在一项病例对照研究中分析了 2007 年 5 月至 2011 年 3 月期间在一家医院的经验。在一项方案中确定了决定进行单肾或双肾移植的标准,该方案中活检评分很重要,但不是唯一因素。还考虑了供体的年龄、病史、肾脏大小和肌酐清除率。在此期间,对 80 名年龄超过 65 岁的供体进行了肾脏移植。40 个器官进行了单肾移植(STx),另外 40 个器官用于 DTx。

结果

单肾移植组的供体平均年龄为 68.7 ± 3.0 岁;双肾移植组为 74.2 ± 4.3 岁(P<.001),双肾移植组的女性供体比例(75%)高于单肾移植组(40%)(P<.001)。两组在肾小球滤过率或蛋白尿方面无差异。分配给 DTx 的肾脏接受的活检评分高于分配给 STx 的肾脏(2.95 ± 1.01 对 1.8 ± 1.04;P<.001)。DTx 受者比 STx 受者年龄更大。两组之间在冷缺血时间、延迟移植物功能、出血并发症或再次手术方面无差异。然而,在 1、3、6 和 12 个月时,DTx 受者的肌酐清除率更好,尽管仅在 6 个月时具有统计学意义(53.4 ± 19.5ml/min 对 44.5 ± 15.6ml/min;P<.05)。2 例 STx 患者和 1 例 DTx 患者的双肾均出现肾动脉血栓形成。DTx 组的另外 2 名患者各因血栓形成和输尿管坏死而失去 1 个肾脏,但仍无需透析。两组的 3 年移植存活率均为 90%。在研究期间,有 3 名患者死亡(2 例在 STx 组,1 例在 DTx 组)。

结论

我们的初步经验表明,尽管手术更复杂,且这些器官的特性可能使它们不适合单肾移植,但 DTx 在存活率和肾功能数据方面提供了良好的结果。进行 DTx 的决定使 ECD 肾脏的使用更加容易,并且应该基于移植前的组织学标准和供体的临床特征的组合。

相似文献

1
Optimising expanded donor organs through dual kidney transplantation: a case-control study.通过双肾移植优化扩展供体器官:一项病例对照研究。
Nefrologia. 2012 May 14;32(3):306-12. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Dec.11173. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
2
Optimization of expanded donors using dual kidney transplantation: case-control study.使用双肾移植优化扩大供体:病例对照研究。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Sep;44(7):2060-2. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.076.
3
Assessment of kidneys procured from expanded criteria donors before transplantation.移植前对来自扩大标准供体的肾脏进行评估。
Transplant Proc. 2009 Oct;41(8):2966-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.08.004.
4
Dual kidney transplantation: a case-control comparison with single kidney transplantation from standard and expanded criteria donors.双肾移植:与来自标准和扩大标准供体的单肾移植的病例对照比较。
Transplantation. 2007 Jun 27;83(12):1551-6. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000266579.11595.95.
5
Intermediate outcomes of dual renal allografts: the University of Washington experience.双肾移植的中期结果:华盛顿大学的经验
J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):855-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000050260.43438.6f.
6
Dual kidney transplants from very old or very young donors: long-term outcomes and complications.来自极老年或极幼年供体的双肾移植:长期结局和并发症
Transplant Proc. 2011 Mar;43(2):507-11. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.038.
7
The LifeLink Foundation and cadaver kidney transplantation in Tampa.生命链接基金会与坦帕的尸体肾移植
Clin Transpl. 1999:149-58.
8
Dual kidney transplantation with organs from extended criteria cadaveric donors.使用边缘供体尸体器官进行双肾移植。
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1477-81. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.021. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
9
The OPTN/UNOS renal transplant registry.器官获取与移植网络/美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处
Clin Transpl. 2004:1-16.
10
Explainable variation in renal transplant outcomes: a comparison of standard and expanded criteria donors.肾移植结果的可解释变异:标准和扩大标准供体的比较。
Clin Transpl. 2004:303-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual Kidney Transplantation: A Review of Past and Prospect for Future.双肾移植:过去回顾与未来展望
Int Sch Res Notices. 2017 Jul 2;2017:2693681. doi: 10.1155/2017/2693681. eCollection 2017.