Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Est Créteil, France.
Eur J Pain. 2012 Nov;16(10):1403-13. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00150.x. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
'Conventional' protocols of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered to M1 can produce analgesia. Theta burst stimulation (TBS), a novel rTMS paradigm, is thought to produce greater changes in M1 excitability than 'conventional' protocols. After a preliminary experiment showing no analgesic effect of continuous or intermittent TBS trains (cTBS or iTBS) delivered to M1 as single procedures, we used TBS to prime a subsequent session of 'conventional' 10 Hz-rTMS.
In 14 patients with chronic refractory neuropathic pain, navigated rTMS was targeted over M1 hand region, contralateral to painful side. Analgesic effects were daily assessed on a visual analogue scale for the week after each 10 Hz-rTMS session, preceded or not by TBS priming. In an additional experiment, the effects on cortical excitability parameters provided by single- and paired-pulse TMS paradigms were studied.
Pain level was reduced after any type of rTMS procedure compared to baseline, but iTBS priming produced greater analgesia than the other protocols. Regarding motor cortex excitability changes, the analgesic effects were associated with an increase in intracortical inhibition, whatever the type of stimulation, primed or non-primed.
The present results show that the analgesic effects of 'conventional' 10 Hz-rTMS delivered to M1 can be enhanced by TBS priming, at least using iTBS. Interestingly, the application of cTBS and iTBS did not produce opposite modulations, unlike previously reported in other systems. It remains to be determined whether the interest of TBS priming is to generate a simple additive effect or a more specific process of cortical plasticity.
高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作用于运动皮层(M1)的“常规”方案可产生镇痛作用。θ爆发刺激(TBS)是一种新的 rTMS 方案,被认为比“常规”方案更能改变 M1 的兴奋性。初步实验表明,单次作用于 M1 的连续或间断 TBS 训练(cTBS 或 iTBS)没有镇痛作用,在此之后,我们使用 TBS 对随后的“常规”10 Hz-rTMS 进行预处理。
14 例慢性难治性神经病理性疼痛患者,经颅磁刺激仪靶向于 M1 手部区域,即疼痛对侧。在每个 10 Hz-rTMS 疗程后一周内,每天使用视觉模拟评分法评估镇痛效果,这些疗程之前或之后是否进行 TBS 预处理。在额外的实验中,研究了单脉冲和双脉冲 TMS 方案对皮质兴奋性参数的影响。
与基线相比,任何 rTMS 方案后疼痛水平均降低,但 iTBS 预处理产生的镇痛效果大于其他方案。关于运动皮层兴奋性变化,镇痛效果与任何刺激类型(预处理或非预处理)的皮质内抑制增加有关。
本研究结果表明,TBS 预处理可增强“常规”10 Hz-rTMS 作用于 M1 的镇痛效果,至少 iTBS 可以。有趣的是,与其他系统先前报道的相反,cTBS 和 iTBS 的应用并没有产生相反的调制。TBS 预处理是否产生简单的累加效应或更特定的皮质可塑性过程,还有待确定。