• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机械通气中吸气压力限制法对脓毒症患者的疗效。

Effectiveness of an inspiratory pressure-limited approach to mechanical ventilation in septic patients.

机构信息

Critical Care Centre, Corporación Sanitaria Universitaria Parc Tauli, Sabadell University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Sabadell, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2013 Jan;41(1):157-64. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00221611. Epub 2012 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1183/09031936.00221611
PMID:22523366
Abstract

Severe sepsis is one of the most common causes of acute lung injury (ALI) and is associated with high mortality. The aim of the study was to see whether a protective strategy based approach with a plateau pressure <30 cmH(2)O was associated with lower mortality in septic patients with ALI in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign international database. A retrospective analysis of an international multicentric database of 15,022 septic patients from 165 intensive care units was used. Septic patients with ALI and mechanical ventilation (n=1,738) had more accompanying organ dysfunction and a higher mortality rate (48.3% versus 33.0%, p<0.001) than septic patients without ALI (n=13,284). In patients with ALI and mechanical ventilation, the use of inspiratory plateau pressures maintained at <30 cmH(2)O was associated with lower mortality by Chi-squared test (46.4% versus 55.1%, p<0.001) and by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test (p<0.001). In a multivariable random-effects Cox regression, plateau pressure <30 cmH(2)O was significantly associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.99; p=0.038). ALI in sepsis was associated with higher mortality, especially when an inspiratory pressure-limited mechanical ventilation approach was not implemented.

摘要

严重脓毒症是急性肺损伤(ALI)最常见的原因之一,与高死亡率相关。本研究旨在观察基于保护策略的平台压<30cmH₂O 是否与国际拯救脓毒症运动(SSC)数据库中患有 ALI 的脓毒症患者的死亡率降低相关。本研究采用了回顾性分析来自 165 个重症监护病房的 15022 例脓毒症患者的国际多中心数据库。患有 ALI 和机械通气的脓毒症患者(n=1738)比没有 ALI 的脓毒症患者(n=13284)有更多的合并器官功能障碍和更高的死亡率(48.3%比 33.0%,p<0.001)。在患有 ALI 和机械通气的患者中,通过卡方检验(46.4%比 55.1%,p<0.001)和 Kaplan-Meier 和对数秩检验(p<0.001)发现,使用平台压维持在<30cmH₂O 的患者死亡率较低。在多变量随机效应 Cox 回归中,平台压<30cmH₂O 与死亡率降低显著相关(风险比 0.84,95%可信区间 0.72-0.99;p=0.038)。脓毒症相关性 ALI 与更高的死亡率相关,尤其是在未实施吸气压力限制机械通气策略的情况下。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of an inspiratory pressure-limited approach to mechanical ventilation in septic patients.机械通气中吸气压力限制法对脓毒症患者的疗效。
Eur Respir J. 2013 Jan;41(1):157-64. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00221611. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
2
Mechanical ventilation and acute lung injury in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational study.机械通气与严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克急诊科患者的急性肺损伤:一项观察性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;20(7):659-69. doi: 10.1111/acem.12167.
3
Lung injury induced by sepsis: lessons learned from large animal models and future directions for treatment.脓毒症导致的肺损伤:大型动物模型中获得的经验教训和治疗的未来方向。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011 Dec;9(12):1169-78. doi: 10.1586/eri.11.141.
4
Prevalence of acute lung injury among medical patients in the emergency department.急诊内科患者急性肺损伤的发生率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1011-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01429.x.
5
Predictors of early acute lung injury at a combat support hospital: a prospective observational study.战斗支援医院早期急性肺损伤的预测因素:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69 Suppl 1:S81-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e44a32.
6
Effect of acute kidney injury on weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients.急性肾损伤对危重症患者机械通气撤机的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):184-91. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249828.81705.65.
7
"Ideal PEEP" is superior to high dose partial liquid ventilation with low PEEP in experimental acute lung injury.在实验性急性肺损伤中,“理想呼气末正压”优于采用低呼气末正压的高剂量部分液体通气。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Dec;27(12):1937-48. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1142-0. Epub 2001 Nov 10.
8
Mortality in sepsis versus non-sepsis induced acute lung injury.脓毒症与非脓毒症所致急性肺损伤患者的死亡率。
Crit Care. 2009;13(5):R150. doi: 10.1186/cc8048. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
9
Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation to conventional mechanical ventilation in the early management of smoke inhalation injury in swine.比较气道压力释放通气与常规机械通气在猪烟雾吸入性损伤早期管理中的应用。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2314-21. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318225b5b3.
10
Noninvasive versus invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure in patients with hematologic malignancies: a 5-year multicenter observational survey.血液恶性肿瘤患者急性呼吸衰竭的无创与有创通气:一项 5 年多中心观察性调查。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2232-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182227a27.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of predictors of mortality and clinical outcomes of different subphenotypes for moderate-to-severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective single-center study.中重度小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征不同亚表型的死亡率及临床结局预测因素分析:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 1;10:1019314. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1019314. eCollection 2022.
2
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Opportunities for Infection and Blood Purification Therapies.拯救脓毒症运动:感染与血液净化疗法的研究机遇
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Sep 7;3(9):e0511. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000511. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Closed-Loop Versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19 ARDS.
新冠肺炎所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的闭环通气与常规机械通气比较。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):1184-1193. doi: 10.1177/08850666211024139. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
4
Heterogeneity of regional inflection points from pressure-volume curves assessed by electrical impedance tomography.通过电阻抗断层成像评估压力-容积曲线的区域性拐点异质性。
Crit Care. 2019 Apr 16;23(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2417-6.
5
Improving clinical outcomes in sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction through precision medicine.通过精准医学改善脓毒症和多器官功能障碍的临床结局。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jan;11(1):21-28. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.74.
6
Will all ARDS patients be receiving mechanical ventilation in 2035? Yes.到2035年,所有急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者都会接受机械通气治疗吗?会的。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Apr;43(4):568-569. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4461-x. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
7
Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: insights and comparisons to ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期目标导向治疗:与ProCESS、ProMISe和ARISE研究的见解及比较
Crit Care. 2016 Jul 1;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1288-3.
8
Personalized medicine for ARDS: the 2035 research agenda.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的个性化医疗:2035年研究议程。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):756-767. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4331-6. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
9
Management of severe sepsis: advances, challenges, and current status.严重脓毒症的管理:进展、挑战与现状
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Apr 9;9:2079-88. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S78757. eCollection 2015.
10
Update in acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的最新进展。
J Intensive Care. 2014 Jan 3;2(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-2. eCollection 2014.