Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2039-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.0505. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
This randomized, multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial tested the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) with gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) compared with GC in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (ROC).
Patients with platinum-sensitive ROC (recurrence ≥ 6 months after front-line platinum-based therapy) and measurable disease were randomly assigned to GC plus either BV or placebo (PL) for six to 10 cycles. BV or PL, respectively, was then continued until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST; secondary end points were objective response rate, duration of response (DOR), overall survival, and safety.
Overall, 484 patients were randomly assigned. PFS for the BV arm was superior to that for the PL arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.484; 95% CI, 0.388 to 0.605; log-rank P < .0001); median PFS was 12.4 v 8.4 months, respectively. The objective response rate (78.5% v 57.4%; P < .0001) and DOR (10.4 v 7.4 months; HR, 0.534; 95% CI, 0.408 to 0.698) were significantly improved with the addition of BV. No new safety concerns were noted. Grade 3 or higher hypertension (17.4% v < 1%) and proteinuria (8.5% v < 1%) occurred more frequently in the BV arm. The rates of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were similar in both arms. Two patients in the BV arm experienced GI perforation after study treatment discontinuation.
GC plus BV followed by BV until progression resulted in a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared with GC plus PL in platinum-sensitive ROC.
本随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照 III 期试验旨在测试贝伐珠单抗(BV)联合吉西他滨和顺铂(GC)与 GC 相比在铂类敏感复发性卵巢癌、原发性腹膜癌或输卵管癌(ROC)中的疗效和安全性。
铂类敏感 ROC(一线铂类治疗后≥6 个月复发)且有可测量疾病的患者被随机分配至 GC 加 BV 或安慰剂(PL)组,接受 6 至 10 个周期的治疗。随后,BV 或 PL 分别持续使用直至疾病进展。主要终点是根据 RECIST 评估的无进展生存期(PFS);次要终点是客观缓解率、缓解持续时间(DOR)、总生存期和安全性。
总体而言,484 名患者被随机分配。BV 组的 PFS 优于 PL 组(风险比[HR],0.484;95%置信区间,0.388 至 0.605;对数秩检验 P<0.0001);中位 PFS 分别为 12.4 个月和 8.4 个月。添加 BV 可显著提高客观缓解率(78.5%比 57.4%;P<0.0001)和 DOR(10.4 个月比 7.4 个月;HR,0.534;95%置信区间,0.408 至 0.698)。未发现新的安全性问题。BV 组更常发生 3 级或更高级别的高血压(17.4%比<1%)和蛋白尿(8.5%比<1%)。两组中性粒细胞减少和发热性中性粒细胞减少的发生率相似。BV 组有 2 例患者在研究治疗停药后发生胃肠道穿孔。
与 GC 加 PL 相比,GC 加 BV 随后加 BV 直至进展可使铂类敏感 ROC 的 PFS 得到统计学显著改善。