Travers E M
Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC.
Clin Lab Med. 1990 Sep;10(3):591-623.
The process of determining laboratory sectional and departmental costs and test costs for instrument-generated and manually generated reportable results for toxicology laboratories has been outlined in this article. It is hoped that the basic principles outlined in the preceding text will clarify and elucidate one of the most important areas needed for laboratory fiscal integrity and its survival in these difficult times for health care providers. The following general principles derived from this article are helpful aids for managers of toxicology laboratories. 1. To manage a cost-effective, efficient toxicology laboratory, several factors must be considered: the laboratory's instrument configuration, test turnaround time needs, the test menu offered, the analytic methods used, the cost of labor based on time expended and the experience and educational level of the staff, and logistics that determine specimen delivery time and costs. 2. There is a wide variation in costs for toxicologic methods, which requires that an analysis of capital (equipment) purchase and operational (test performance) costs be performed to avoid waste, purchase wisely, and determine which tests consume the majority of the laboratory's resources. 3. Toxicologic analysis is composed of many complex steps. Each step must be individually cost-accounted. Screening test results must be confirmed, and the cost for both steps must be included in the cost per reportable result. 4. Total costs will vary in the same laboratory and between laboratories based on differences in salaries paid to technical staff, differences in reagent/supply costs, the number of technical staff needed to operate the analyzer or perform the method, and the inefficient use of highly paid staff to operate the analyzer or perform the method. 5. Since direct test costs vary directly with the type and number of analyzers or methods and are dependent on the operational mode designed by the manufacturer, laboratory managers should construct an actual test-cost data base for instrument or method in use to accurately compare costs using the "bottom-up" approach. 6. Laboratory expenses can be examined from three perspectives: total laboratory, laboratory section, and subsection workstation. The objective is to track all laboratory expenses through each of these levels. 7. In the final analysis, a portion of total laboratory expenses must be allocated to each unit of laboratory output--the billable procedure or, in laboratories where tests are not billed, the tests produced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本文概述了毒理学实验室确定仪器生成和手工生成可报告结果的实验室科室成本、部门成本及检测成本的过程。希望前文所述的基本原则能阐明并阐释实验室财务诚信以及在医疗服务提供商面临的艰难时期得以存续所需的最重要领域之一。本文得出的以下一般原则对毒理学实验室管理人员很有帮助。1. 要管理一个经济高效的毒理学实验室,必须考虑几个因素:实验室的仪器配置、检测周转时间需求、提供的检测项目菜单、使用的分析方法、基于花费时间以及员工经验和教育水平的劳动力成本,以及决定样本运送时间和成本的后勤因素。2. 毒理学方法的成本差异很大,这就要求对资本(设备)购置和运营(检测执行)成本进行分析,以避免浪费、明智采购,并确定哪些检测消耗了实验室的大部分资源。3. 毒理学分析由许多复杂步骤组成。每个步骤都必须单独进行成本核算。筛查检测结果必须得到确认,这两个步骤的成本都必须包含在每个可报告结果的成本中。4. 基于支付给技术人员的薪资差异、试剂/耗材成本差异、操作分析仪或执行该方法所需的技术人员数量,以及高薪员工操作分析仪或执行该方法的低效使用情况,同一实验室以及不同实验室的总成本会有所不同。5. 由于直接检测成本直接随分析仪或方法的类型和数量而变化,并且取决于制造商设计的操作模式,实验室管理人员应构建一个针对在用仪器或方法的实际检测成本数据库,以便使用“自下而上”的方法准确比较成本。6. 实验室费用可以从三个角度进行审视:整个实验室、实验室科室以及子科室工作站。目标是在这些层面中的每一个层面追踪所有实验室费用。7. 归根结底,实验室总费用的一部分必须分配到实验室产出的每个单位——可计费程序,或者在不进行检测计费的实验室中,分配到所产生的检测项目上。(摘要截选至400字)