Suppr超能文献

血路管的生物相容性

Biocompatibility of blood tubings.

作者信息

Branger B, Garreau M, Baudin G, Gris J C

机构信息

Nephrology Department, University Hospital, Nîmes, France.

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 1990 Oct;13(10):697-703.

PMID:2254048
Abstract

We studied hemocompatibility of various blood tubings with C3a anaphylatoxin measurement and comparative electron scanning microscopy. The following tubing materials were tested: polyvinylchloride (PVC) plasticised with phthalate (PVC), pvc plasticised with phthalate coextruded with polyurethane (PIV), and two phthalate-free lines: pvc plasticised with trimellitate coextruded with polyurethane (TRI) and pvc plasticised with LT 360 (LTP). Results of C3a generation rate showed a significant activation by all blood tubings, with a reduced rate with PIV when compared to all others. Electron scanning microscopy showed marked alterations of PIV surface on tubings stored for 6 months. Protein deposits on internal surfaces after dialysis were similar whatever tubing material was tested, but adhesive cell number was greater with TRI when compared to PVC and LTP. Hemocompatibility is unchanged with phthalate-free tubings when compared to phthalate plasticised ones. In contrast with phthalate plasticised PVC there is no beneficial effect of polyurethane coextrusion with trimellitate plasticised PVC in regard to C3a generation.

摘要

我们通过测量C3a过敏毒素和比较电子扫描显微镜研究了各种血路管的血液相容性。测试了以下管路材料:用邻苯二甲酸酯增塑的聚氯乙烯(PVC)、与聚氨酯共挤出的用邻苯二甲酸酯增塑的PVC(PIV),以及两条无邻苯二甲酸酯的产品线:与聚氨酯共挤出的用偏苯三酸酯增塑的PVC(TRI)和用LT 360增塑的PVC(LTP)。C3a生成率的结果显示,所有血路管均有显著激活,与其他所有材料相比,PIV的激活率降低。电子扫描显微镜显示,储存6个月的管路中PIV表面有明显变化。无论测试何种管路材料,透析后内表面的蛋白质沉积相似,但与PVC和LTP相比,TRI的黏附细胞数更多。与用邻苯二甲酸酯增塑的管路相比,无邻苯二甲酸酯的管路血液相容性不变。与用邻苯二甲酸酯增塑的PVC相反,在C3a生成方面,聚氨酯与用偏苯三酸酯增塑的PVC共挤出没有有益效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验