Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jun;29(6):261-70. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283542329.
Anaesthesia dosing in infants (0-2 years) should be based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations and adverse effects profiles. Disease processes and treatments in this group are distinct from those in adults. Absorption, distribution and clearance change dramatically during this period because of maturation of anatomical and physiological processes as well as behavioural changes. Pharmacogenomic expression also matures in this period. Population-based and physiological-based pharmacokinetic modelling has improved the understanding of maturation and subsequent dose approximation. Postmenstrual, rather than postnatal, age is a reasonable measure for maturation. There remains a need for clinically applicable tools to assess pharmacodynamics which can provide response feedback; this has been achieved for neuromuscular monitoring, but not yet fully for depth of anaesthesia, sedation or pain. Morbidity and mortality associated with paediatric anaesthesia have historically been highest in this age group and continue to be so. Some of this morbidity was attributable to a poor understanding of developmental pharmacology; this facet continues to plague the specialty.
婴儿(0-2 岁)的麻醉剂量应基于药代动力学-药效学考虑和不良反应谱。该年龄段的疾病过程和治疗方法与成人不同。由于解剖和生理过程以及行为变化的成熟,吸收、分布和清除在此期间会发生显著变化。药物基因组表达也在此期间成熟。基于人群和基于生理学的药代动力学模型提高了对成熟和随后剂量近似的理解。绝经后而不是产后年龄是衡量成熟的合理指标。仍然需要临床适用的工具来评估可以提供反应反馈的药效学;这已经在神经肌肉监测方面实现,但在麻醉深度、镇静或疼痛方面尚未完全实现。儿科麻醉相关的发病率和死亡率在历史上一直是该年龄段最高的,而且这种情况仍在继续。其中一些发病率归因于对发育药理学的理解不足;这一方面继续困扰着该专业。