Suppr超能文献

前瞻性研究接受传统疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗的类风湿关节炎患者乙型肝炎病毒再激活的风险。

Prospective study of HBV reactivation risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients who received conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, 63 Wenhua Road, Nanchong, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Aug;31(8):1169-75. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1988-2. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

Abstract

Studies that reported hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have caused attention of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-related HBV reactivation. Most of the studies were focused on HBV reactivation risk of biologic DMARDs; insufficient data are available to identify the exact risk of conventional DMARD (c-DMARD)-related HBV reactivation. This prospective study aimed to investigate the risk of HBV reactivation in HBV-infected RA patients who received c-DMARDs. A total of 476 RA patients were screened in this prospective non-randomized, non-controlled study. HBV-infected patients characterized by hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive or HBsAg negative/anti-hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positive were analyzed for HBV DNA, followed with HBV DNA monitoring scheduled every 3 months, serum alanine aminotransferase test at 2-month intervals, or more frequently. Prevalence of HBsAg positive and HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive was 6.51 and 51.1 %, respectively, among the 476 RA patients. Among 211 patients (23 patients were HBsAg positive and 188 patients were HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive) who received c-DMARDs without antiviral prophylactic treatment, 4 patients developed HBV reactivation. Both HBsAg positive and HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive patients have the possibility of developing HBV reactivation. There was no correlation between HBV reactivation and any specific c-DMARD. Glucocorticoid coadministration and negative anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) at baseline showed correlation with reactivation. In conclusion, it would be rational to initiate antiviral prophylaxis according to risk stratification rather than universal prophylaxis for HBV-infected RA patients. Conventional DMARDs are relatively safe to HBV-infected patients with low reactivation risk (low HBV DNA level, no GCs administration, and anti-HB positive).

摘要

本研究旨在探讨接受传统疾病修饰抗风湿药物(c-DMARD)治疗的乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者发生 HBV 再激活的风险。在这项前瞻性非随机、非对照研究中,共筛选了 476 例 RA 患者。对 HBV 感染患者(乙型肝炎表面抗原 [HBsAg] 阳性或 HBsAg 阴性/抗乙型肝炎核心抗原 [抗-HBc] 阳性)进行 HBV DNA 检测,并在 HBV DNA 监测每 3 个月、每 2 个月检测血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)或更频繁的情况下进行 HBV DNA 监测。476 例 RA 患者中,HBsAg 阳性和 HBsAg 阴性/抗-HBc 阳性的患者分别占 6.51%和 51.1%。在接受 c-DMARD 治疗而未进行抗病毒预防性治疗的 211 例患者(23 例 HBsAg 阳性,188 例 HBsAg 阴性/抗-HBc 阳性)中,有 4 例发生 HBV 再激活。HBsAg 阳性和 HBsAg 阴性/抗-HBc 阳性患者均有发生 HBV 再激活的可能。HBV 再激活与任何特定的 c-DMARD 之间均无相关性。糖皮质激素联合治疗和基线时抗乙型肝炎表面抗原(抗-HBs)阴性与再激活相关。总之,对于 HBV 感染的 RA 患者,根据风险分层而非普遍预防来启动抗病毒预防是合理的。对于低再激活风险(低 HBV DNA 水平、无 GC 治疗和抗-HB 阳性)的 HBV 感染患者,传统 DMARD 相对安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验