Luminescent Materials Laboratory, RIKEN (The Institute of Physical & Chemical Research), Hirosawa 2-1, Wako-shi 351-0198, Japan.
Inorg Chem. 2012 May 21;51(10):5805-13. doi: 10.1021/ic300333c. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
The homoleptic complex [Ag(L)(2)]PF(6) (1) and heteroleptic complexes [Ag(L)(L(Me))]BF(4) (2) and [Ag(L)(L(Et))]BF(4) (3) [L = 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene, L(Me) = 1,2-bis[bis(2-methylphenyl)phosphino]benzene, and L(Et) = 1,2-bis[bis(2-ethylphenyl)phosphino]benzene] were synthesized and characterized. X-ray crystallography demonstrated that 1-3 possess tetrahedral structures. Photophysical studies and time-dependent density functional theory calculations of 1-3 revealed that alkyl substituents at the ortho positions of peripheral phenyl groups in the diphosphine ligands have a significant influence on the energy and intensity of phosphorescence of the complex in solution at room temperature. The results can be interpreted in terms of the geometric preferences of each complex in the ground and excited states. The homoleptic complex 1 exhibits weak orange phosphorescence in solution arising from its flat structure in the triplet state, while heteroleptic complexes 2 and 3 show strong green phosphorescence from triplet states with tetrahedral structure. Larger interligand steric interactions in 2 and 3 caused by their bulkier ligands probably inhibit geometric relaxation within the excited-state lifetimes, leading to higher energy phosphorescence than that observed for 1. NMR experiments revealed that 2 and 3 in solution possess structures that are much more immobilized than that of 1; fluxional motion is completely suppressed in 2 and 3. Accordingly, conformational changes of 2 and 3 are expected to be suppressed by the alkyl substituents not only in the ground state but also in excited states. Consequently, nonradiative decay of the excited states of 2 and 3 occurs less efficiently than in 1. As a result, the quantum yields of phosphorescence for 2 and 3 are 6 times larger than that for the homoleptic complex 1.
合成并表征了具有夹心结构的[Ag(L)(2)]PF_6(1)、[Ag(L)(L(Me))]BF_4(2)和[Ag(L)(L(Et))]BF_4(3)(L=1,2-双(二苯基膦基)苯,L(Me)=1,2-双[双(2-甲基苯基)膦基]苯,L(Et)=1,2-双[双(2-乙基苯基)膦基]苯)。X 射线晶体学表明 1-3 具有四面体结构。1-3 的光物理研究和含时密度泛函理论计算表明,二膦配体中对位芳基上的烷基取代基对室温下溶液中配合物磷光的能量和强度有显著影响。这一结果可以用各配合物在基态和激发态下的几何偏好来解释。具有夹心结构的 1 在溶液中表现出较弱的橙色磷光,这是由于其三重态的平面结构;而具有四面体结构的杂化配合物 2 和 3 则表现出较强的绿色磷光。2 和 3 中较大的配体间位阻可能会在激发态寿命内抑制几何弛豫,导致磷光能量高于 1。NMR 实验表明,2 和 3 在溶液中具有比 1 更固定的结构;在 2 和 3 中,动态运动完全被抑制。因此,构象变化不仅在基态,而且在激发态下都受到烷基取代基的抑制。因此,2 和 3 的激发态非辐射衰减效率低于 1。结果,2 和 3 的磷光量子产率比具有夹心结构的 1 高 6 倍。