• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同时放置的血管内装置的内外表面上微生物定植的密度。

Density of microbial colonization on external and internal surfaces of concurrently placed intravascular devices.

机构信息

Launceston General Hospital, School of Human Life Sciences, University of Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2012 May;21(3):162-71. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012675.

DOI:10.4037/ajcc2012675
PMID:22549572
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intravascular devices provide essential vascular access for management of critically ill patients but can be associated with bloodstream infections.

OBJECTIVES

To determine colonization rates in segments of concurrently placed peripheral arterial, nontunnelled short-term central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters and the pattern of heaviest colonization when the catheters are removed.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on inpatients with intravascular devices in place for 9 days or more. At removal, each catheter was cut into 3 segments, and each segment was cultured separately. The density of colonization on external and internal surfaces of each segment was compared by estimating odds ratios by repeated-measures ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 48 peripheral arterial, 135 central venous, and 106 peripherally inserted central catheters were obtained from 289 patients. Colonization was greatest at the proximal external segment of all catheters. On the external surface, colonization was lower on the middle (odds ratio, 0.70; P < .001) and distal (odds ratio, 0.56; P < .001) segments than on the proximal segments. On the internal surface, colonization was lower on the proximal (odds ratio, 0.39; P < .001), middle (odds ratio, 0.30; P < .001), and distal (odds ratio, 0.31; P < .001) segments than on the external proximal segments. This trend was similar for all catheter types.

CONCLUSION

Colonization of intravascular devices was heaviest on proximal segments.

摘要

背景

血管内装置为危重症患者的血管管理提供了必要的血管通路,但可能与血流感染有关。

目的

确定同时放置的外周动脉、无隧道短期中心静脉导管和外周置入中心导管各段的定植率,以及导管拔出时定植最严重的模式。

方法

对 289 例血管内装置留置 9 天或以上的住院患者进行前瞻性研究。在取出时,将每个导管切成 3 段,并分别对每个段进行培养。通过重复测量有序逻辑回归估计比值比来比较每个段的内外表面的定植密度。

结果

从 289 例患者中获得了 48 根外周动脉导管、135 根中心静脉导管和 106 根外周置入中心导管。所有导管的近端外段定植最多。在外部表面,中间段(比值比,0.70;P <.001)和远端段(比值比,0.56;P <.001)的定植率低于近端段。在内部表面,近端段(比值比,0.39;P <.001)、中间段(比值比,0.30;P <.001)和远端段(比值比,0.31;P <.001)的定植率低于外近端段。所有导管类型均有类似的趋势。

结论

血管内装置的定植最严重的是近端段。

相似文献

1
Density of microbial colonization on external and internal surfaces of concurrently placed intravascular devices.同时放置的血管内装置的内外表面上微生物定植的密度。
Am J Crit Care. 2012 May;21(3):162-71. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012675.
2
Comparison of Oligon catheters and chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges with standard multilumen central venous catheters for prevention of associated colonization and infections in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study.对比寡肽导管和氯己定浸渍海绵与标准多腔中心静脉导管在预防重症监护病房患者相关定植和感染的效果:一项多中心、随机、对照研究。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):420-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f0d4b.
3
Comparison of silver-impregnated with standard multi-lumen central venous catheters in critically ill patients.危重症患者中银浸渍多腔中心静脉导管与标准多腔中心静脉导管的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1032-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259378.53166.1B.
4
Prospective study of peripheral arterial catheter infection and comparison with concurrently sited central venous catheters.外周动脉导管感染的前瞻性研究及与同期放置的中心静脉导管的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):397-402. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318161f74b.
5
A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management.一项关于纱布和两种聚氨酯敷料用于肺动脉导管置管部位护理的前瞻性随机试验:对导管管理的启示
Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;22(11):1729-37.
6
Central venous catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: a comparison between standard and silver-integrated catheters.危重症患者中心静脉导管定植和导管相关血流感染:标准导管与含银导管的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Sep;26(9):752-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832a3a84.
7
Reduced colonization and infection with miconazole-rifampicin modified central venous catheters: a randomized controlled clinical trial.咪康唑-利福平改良中心静脉导管减少定植与感染:一项随机对照临床试验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Dec;54(6):1109-15. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh483. Epub 2004 Nov 10.
8
Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients in an intensive care unit.抗菌浸渍导管对重症监护病房患者导管定植及导管相关血流感染的疗效
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Feb;62(2):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.06.030. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
9
Catheter-related infections via temporary vascular access catheters: a randomized prospective study.经临时血管通路导管相关的感染:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Artif Organs. 2010 Mar;34(3):E72-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00960.x.
10
Infection and natural history of emergency department-placed central venous catheters.急诊科中心静脉置管的感染与自然史。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;56(5):492-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.033. Epub 2010 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Skin Colonisation And Placement of vascular access device Exit sites (ESCAPE Study).皮肤定植及血管通路装置出口部位评估(ESCAPE研究)
J Infect Prev. 2019 Jan;20(1):51-59. doi: 10.1177/1757177418805836. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of semi-quantitative and quantitative culture techniques for the diagnosis of catheter-related infections in newborns and molecular typing of isolated microorganisms.半定量和定量培养技术对新生儿导管相关感染诊断及分离微生物分子分型的诊断准确性
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 May 22;14:283. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-283.