Suppr超能文献

前瞻性对比研究两种不同固定技术在半月板同种异体移植中的应用。

Prospective comparative study between two different fixation techniques in meniscal allograft transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Quintí 89, 08041 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Jul;21(7):1516-22. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2032-4. Epub 2012 May 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the functional and radiographic results between two different horn fixation techniques for meniscal allograft transplant.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of 88 meniscal allograft transplants with a mean 5-year follow-up. Forty transplants were performed on the medial compartment and 48 on the lateral compartment. The same surgeon performed all surgeries. Thirty-three grafts were fixed only with sutures (Group A) and 55 only with bony fixation (Group B). Both groups were comparable in terms of age, laterality, time since meniscectomy and preoperative functional and radiographic status. Functional assessment was done with Lysholm and Tegner scores and the Visual Analogical Scale for pain. Joint space narrowing was evaluated in the Rosenberg view.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in Lysholm, Tegner and VAS scores without differences between Group A and Group B (n.s.). Radiographic evaluation did not show any joint space narrowing (n.s.). No differences in the comparison of all the variables of the two compartments were found. There were complications in 33.3 % of patients in Group A that including 7 graft tears (21.4 %) and in which there was an allograft failure rate of 9 %. Group B showed complications in 16.4 % of the patients and included 4 graft tears (7.3 %, n.s.) with an allograft failure rate of 3.6 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Meniscal allograft transplantation with either technique provided good functional and radiographic results at mid-term follow-up. Both graft fixation methods showed no differences relative to functional and radiographic results. There was a considerably higher rate of complications in transplantations performed with the only-suture technique than those with bony fixation, although the difference was not statistically significant with the numbers available. The results suggest that similar functional results should be expected whether the meniscal graft includes bone plugs or not. However, graft tears seem to happen more frequently if the MAT is performed without bony fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective comparative study, Level II.

摘要

目的

比较半月板同种异体移植两种不同固定技术的功能和影像学结果。

方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,共纳入 88 例半月板同种异体移植患者,平均随访 5 年。40 例移植于内侧间室,48 例移植于外侧间室。所有手术均由同一位外科医生完成。33 例移植物仅用缝线固定(A 组),55 例仅用骨固定(B 组)。两组在年龄、侧别、半月板切除后时间以及术前功能和影像学状态方面具有可比性。功能评估采用 Lysholm 和 Tegner 评分以及疼痛视觉模拟评分。关节间隙狭窄在 Rosenberg 位进行评估。

结果

A 组和 B 组的 Lysholm、Tegner 和 VAS 评分均有显著改善,两组间无差异(n.s.)。影像学评估未显示任何关节间隙狭窄(n.s.)。两组间所有变量的比较均无差异。A 组 33.3%的患者出现并发症,包括 7 例移植物撕裂(21.4%),同种异体移植失败率为 9%。B 组 16.4%的患者出现并发症,包括 4 例移植物撕裂(7.3%,n.s.),同种异体移植失败率为 3.6%。

结论

在中期随访中,两种技术的半月板同种异体移植均提供了良好的功能和影像学结果。两种移植物固定方法在功能和影像学结果方面均无差异。仅用缝线固定的移植术并发症发生率明显高于骨固定,尽管根据现有数据,差异无统计学意义。结果表明,无论半月板移植物是否包含骨栓,都应预期具有相似的功能结果。然而,如果不进行骨固定,MAT 似乎更容易发生移植物撕裂。

证据水平

前瞻性比较研究,II 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验