Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):e709-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 May 2.
To verify the geometric accuracy of gated RapidArc treatment using kV images acquired during dose delivery.
Twenty patients were treated using the gated RapidArc technique with a Varian TrueBeam STx linear accelerator. One to 7 metallic fiducial markers were implanted inside or near the tumor target before treatment simulation. For patient setup and treatment verification purposes, the internal target volume (ITV) was created, corresponding to each implanted marker. The gating signal was generated from the Real-time Position Management (RPM) system. At the beginning of each fraction, individualized respiratory gating amplitude thresholds were set based on fluoroscopic image guidance. During the treatment, we acquired kV images immediately before MV beam-on at every breathing cycle, using the on-board imaging system. After the treatment, all implanted markers were detected, and their 3-dimensional (3D) positions in the patient were estimated using software developed in-house. The distance from the marker to the corresponding ITV was calculated for each patient by averaging over all markers and all fractions.
The average 3D distance between the markers and their ITVs was 0.8 ± 0.5 mm (range, 0-1.7 mm) and was 2.1 ± 1.2 mm at the 95th percentile (range, 0-3.8 mm). On average, a left-right margin of 0.6 mm, an anterior-posterior margin of 0.8 mm, and a superior-inferior margin of 1.5 mm is required to account for 95% of the intrafraction uncertainty in RPM-based RapidArc gating.
To our knowledge, this is the first clinical report of intrafraction verification of respiration-gated RapidArc treatment in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy. For some patients, the markers deviated significantly from the ITV by more than 2 mm at the beginning of the MV beam-on. This emphasizes the need for gating techniques with beam-on/-off controlled directly by the actual position of the tumor target instead of external surrogates such as RPM.
使用在剂量输送过程中获取的千伏(kV)图像验证门控 RapidArc 治疗的几何精度。
20 名患者使用瓦里安 TrueBeam STx 直线加速器进行门控 RapidArc 治疗。在治疗模拟之前,在肿瘤靶区内部或附近植入 1 到 7 个金属基准标记物。为了患者设置和治疗验证目的,创建了与每个植入标记物相对应的内部靶区(ITV)。门控信号由实时位置管理(RPM)系统生成。在每个分次的开始,根据荧光透视图像引导为每个分次设置个体化呼吸门控幅度阈值。在治疗过程中,我们使用机载成像系统在每个呼吸周期的 MV 束开启前立即获取 kV 图像。治疗后,使用内部开发的软件检测所有植入的标记物,并估计它们在患者体内的 3 维(3D)位置。通过对所有标记物和所有分次进行平均,计算每个患者标记物与相应 ITV 之间的距离。
标记物与 ITV 之间的平均 3D 距离为 0.8 ± 0.5mm(范围,0-1.7mm),第 95 百分位数(范围,0-3.8mm)为 2.1 ± 1.2mm。平均而言,为了在基于 RPM 的 RapidArc 门控中考虑 95%的分次内不确定性,需要左右边界为 0.6mm,前后边界为 0.8mm,上下边界为 1.5mm。
据我们所知,这是首例立体定向消融放射治疗中呼吸门控 RapidArc 治疗的分次内验证的临床报告。对于一些患者,在 MV 束开启时,标记物与 ITV 的偏差超过 2mm。这强调了需要使用直接由肿瘤靶区的实际位置控制的门控技术,而不是 RPM 等外部替代物。