University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida 32209, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 May 8;59(19):1681-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.039.
The purpose of this study is to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of different prasugrel dosing regimens in patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy.
There are a growing number of patients on chronic prasugrel therapy regimens, leading to questions about the dosing regimen of prasugrel to administer if percutaneous coronary intervention is required.
This is a prospective pharmacodynamic study in patients (n = 64) receiving maintenance prasugrel therapy who were randomly allocated to a 10 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg dose of prasugrel. Pharmacodynamic assessments using multiple assays were conducted at 3 timepoints (baseline and 1 h and 4 h after dosing).
Intragroup comparisons showed that a 60 mg dose reduced the platelet reactivity index (PRI) after 1 h (p = 0.004) and 4 h (p < 0.001, primary endpoint; p = 0.002 between 1 h and 4 h). A 30 mg dose also reduced PRI levels at 1 h (p = 0.006) and 4 h (p < 0.001; p = 0.044 between 1 h and 4 h). A 10 mg dose was associated with modest pharmacodynamic effects. Intragroup comparisons showed similar findings with VerifyNow-P2Y12 and light transmission aggregometry. Intergroup comparisons showed that a 60 mg dose achieved lower PRI levels than 30 mg at 4 h (p = 0.05), and a numerical trend toward better pharmacodynamic effects at 1 h (p = 0.171). Intergroup comparisons were similar with VerifyNow-P2Y12, but not light transmission aggregometry.
For patients on maintenance prasugrel therapy, a 60 mg dosing strategy is associated with faster and higher platelet inhibition compared with lower doses, as assessed by P2Y(12) specific assays. (Impact of Prasugrel Re-load on Platelet Aggregation in Patients on Chronic Prasugrel Therapy; NCT01201772).
本研究旨在评估不同普拉格雷剂量方案在维持普拉格雷治疗患者中的药效学效应。
接受慢性普拉格雷治疗方案的患者数量不断增加,这引发了一个问题,即在需要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,应该给予普拉格雷的剂量方案。
这是一项针对正在接受维持普拉格雷治疗的患者(n=64)的前瞻性药效学研究,这些患者被随机分配至普拉格雷 10 mg、30 mg 或 60 mg 剂量组。在 3 个时间点(基线和给药后 1 h 和 4 h)进行使用多种检测方法的药效学评估。
组内比较显示,60 mg 剂量可降低 1 h(p=0.004)和 4 h(p<0.001,主要终点;p=0.002 为 1 h 和 4 h 之间)时的血小板反应指数(PRI)。30 mg 剂量也可降低 1 h(p=0.006)和 4 h(p<0.001;p=0.044 为 1 h 和 4 h 之间)时的 PRI 水平。10 mg 剂量与适度的药效学效应相关。组内比较显示,VerifyNow-P2Y12 和光传输聚集法也有类似的发现。组间比较显示,60 mg 剂量在 4 h 时达到的 PRI 水平低于 30 mg 剂量(p=0.05),在 1 h 时药效学效应呈数值上的改善趋势(p=0.171)。VerifyNow-P2Y12 的组间比较相似,但光传输聚集法则不然。
对于正在接受维持普拉格雷治疗的患者,与较低剂量相比,60 mg 给药方案与更快和更高的血小板抑制作用相关,这可通过 P2Y12 特异性检测进行评估。(普拉格雷再负荷对慢性普拉格雷治疗患者血小板聚集的影响;NCT01201772)。