• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:来自印度单中心6年经验的肿瘤学结果分析

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological outcome analysis from a single-center Indian experience of 6 years.

作者信息

Mishra Shashikant, Agrawal Vikas, Khatri Naushad, Sharma Rajan, Kurien Abraham, Ganpule Arvind, Muthu V, Sabnis Ravindra B, Desai Mahesh R

机构信息

Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadaid, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Indian J Urol. 2012 Jan;28(1):32-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.94953.

DOI:10.4103/0970-1591.94953
PMID:22557714
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3339783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of published data on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in India. Although the published short-term oncologic outcomes after LRP are encouraging, intermediate and long-term data are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the oncological outcome after LRP based on 6 years of experience and compared it with the other single-center published literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the 90 patients who underwent LRP for a clinical T2 localized disease, 73 patients with at least a follow up of one year were analyzed. Patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk D'Amico groups in 22 (30%), 26 (36%), and 25 (34%) of the patient population, respectively. Progression of disease was defined as a PSA of 0.4ng/ml with a confirmatory rise. We used Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates to calculate actuarial 5-year probabilities of biochemical progression-free survival. Univariate analysis of risk factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) was done.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 63.3 ± 6.6 years. The average follow-up for patients was 22 (12-72) months. There was no prostatic cancer-specific mortality. Fourteen patients had BCR. The 5-year progression-free probability for men with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancers was 91%, 82%, and 58%, respectively. High-risk group, Gleason sum more than 8, extracapsular extension, and positive surgical margin were significantly associated with biochemical progression.

CONCLUSIONS

LRP provided a similar level of oncological success as reported by the other contemporary single-center published literature.

摘要

背景

印度缺乏关于腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)的已发表数据。尽管已发表的LRP术后短期肿瘤学结果令人鼓舞,但缺乏中期和长期数据。

目的

我们基于6年的经验分析了LRP后的肿瘤学结果,并将其与其他单中心发表的文献进行比较。

材料与方法

在90例行LRP治疗临床T2期局限性疾病的患者中,分析了73例至少随访1年的患者。患者分别被分为低危、中危和高危D'Amico组,分别占患者总数的22例(30%)、26例(36%)和25例(34%)。疾病进展定义为前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)为0.4ng/ml且有确认性升高。我们使用Kaplan-Meier乘积限估计法计算无生化进展生存的精算5年概率。对生化复发(BCR)的危险因素进行单因素分析。

结果

患者的平均年龄为63.3±6.6岁。患者的平均随访时间为22(12 - 72)个月。无前列腺癌特异性死亡。14例患者发生BCR。低危、中危和高危前列腺癌男性的5年无进展概率分别为91%、82%和58%。高危组、 Gleason评分总和超过8分、包膜外侵犯和手术切缘阳性与生化进展显著相关。

结论

LRP提供了与其他当代单中心发表文献报道相似水平的肿瘤学成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cc7/3339783/afabf14e7dde/IJU-28-32-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cc7/3339783/d1d399aab766/IJU-28-32-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cc7/3339783/67e713036eba/IJU-28-32-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cc7/3339783/afabf14e7dde/IJU-28-32-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cc7/3339783/d1d399aab766/IJU-28-32-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cc7/3339783/67e713036eba/IJU-28-32-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cc7/3339783/afabf14e7dde/IJU-28-32-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological outcome analysis from a single-center Indian experience of 6 years.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:来自印度单中心6年经验的肿瘤学结果分析
Indian J Urol. 2012 Jan;28(1):32-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.94953.
2
Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期肿瘤学和控尿效果:单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E985-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11279.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
3
Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.微创根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:肿瘤学结局的综合评估与累积求和分析
Urol Oncol. 2017 Apr;35(4):149.e1-149.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.10.015. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
Pathological outcomes and biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer in the Indian population.印度人群中高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的病理结果及无生化复发生存率
Indian J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):260-267. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_65_18.
5
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of oncological outcomes at a single center.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:单中心肿瘤学结果比较
Prostate Int. 2020 Mar;8(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
6
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy monotherapy, a more aggressive yet less invasive option, is oncologically effective in selected men with high-risk prostate cancer having only one D'Amico risk factor: experience from an Asian tertiary referral center.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术单药治疗是一种更具侵袭性但侵入性更小的选择,对于仅具有 1 个 D'Amico 危险因素的高危前列腺癌的特定男性患者,在肿瘤学上是有效的:来自亚洲三级转诊中心的经验。
J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):165-71. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0118. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
7
Implications of greater short-term PSA recurrence with laparoscopic as compared to retropubic radical prostatectomy for Japanese clinically localized prostate carcinomas.与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术相比,腹腔镜手术治疗日本临床局限性前列腺癌短期前列腺特异抗原(PSA)复发率更高的影响
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(11):2959-61.
8
[Comparison of the Biochemical Recurrence risk between Radical Prostatectomy and Brachytherapy in the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer].[根治性前列腺切除术与近距离放射治疗在低危和中危前列腺癌治疗中生化复发风险的比较]
Arch Esp Urol. 2015 Oct;68(8):655-60.
9
Oncologic outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years of experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的肿瘤学结局:10年经验
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1014-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.10.036. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
10
Long-Term Oncologic Outcome of an Initial Series of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer After a Median Follow-up of 10 Years.对一系列临床局限性前列腺癌患者进行腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后,经过10年的中位随访得出的长期肿瘤学结果。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Aug;14(4):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate cancer in Asia: A collaborative report.亚洲的前列腺癌:一份合作报告。
Asian J Urol. 2014 Oct;1(1):15-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2014.08.007. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy does not substantially impact prognostic factor estimates.根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的定义并不会显著影响预后因素的估计。
J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):984-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.027. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
2
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:10 年经验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2009 Sep-Oct;35(5):565-71; discussion 571-2. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382009000500008.
3
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single centre experience after 5 years.
Hong Kong Med J. 2008 Jun;14(3):192-7.
4
Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005.2003年至2005年期间对开放性和腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的结果进行的全面前瞻性比较分析。
J Urol. 2008 May;179(5):1811-7; discussion 1817. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.026. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
5
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
6
Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures.内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术:700例手术后的肿瘤学及功能结果
J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1271-5; discussion 1275. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173940.49015.4a.
7
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术
J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1072-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154970.63147.90.
8
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological results in the first 500 patients.采用海尔布隆技术的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:前500例患者的肿瘤学结果。
J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):761-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000153486.94741.e5.
9
Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: part I.开放性与腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术:第一部分。
BJU Int. 2004 Jul;94(2):238-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04950.x.
10
Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:一位外科医生的手术结果比较。
Urology. 2004 May;63(5):819-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.038.