• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single centre experience after 5 years.

作者信息

Chan Steven W H, Lam K M, Kwok S C, Yu C, Au W H, Yung Y P, Mah Ida S F, Chu Peggy S K, Man C W

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Hong Kong Med J. 2008 Jun;14(3):192-7.

PMID:18525087
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To summarise our experience of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a single centre in Hong Kong over 5 years.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Urology Division, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong.

PATIENTS

A total of 87 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from March 2002 to May 2007.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Peri-operative data and follow-up information.

RESULTS

The operative procedure used entailed Montsouris technique and its modifications, including the latest method involving the extraperitoneal descending technique. In all, 87 patients underwent the operation; in two, the procedure was converted to open surgery. Peri-operative parameters which showed improvement included: operating time, blood loss, resort to blood transfusions, and the complication rate. There was no operation-related mortality. In organ-confined disease, a clear surgical margin was achieved in 93% of the patients, but in those whose disease was not organ-confined, the positive margin rate was 87%. Among patients with organ-confined disease, 13% had evidence of biochemical recurrence. Hormonal therapy was started in five patients, none of whom died during the follow-up period (mean, 24 months). Continence recovered in 69% of the patients by 6 months and in 92% by 12 months post-surgery. Assessment of erectile function before and after the surgery was problematic and estimated to be 20% among patients having the nerve-sparing procedure performed.

CONCLUSION

Although Hong Kong has a relatively low incidence for prostate cancer, it was possible to develop laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with acceptable early results. Further follow-up is warranted before formulating definitive conclusions about this procedure.

摘要

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single centre experience after 5 years.
Hong Kong Med J. 2008 Jun;14(3):192-7.
2
Single-port transvesical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer: technique and outcomes.经单孔经膀胱腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗局限性前列腺癌:技术与疗效。
BJU Int. 2013 Nov;112(7):944-52. doi: 10.1111/bju.12225. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
3
Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期肿瘤学和控尿效果:单中心经验。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E985-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11279.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
4
A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与单纯腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的直接比较:单机构经验
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.111. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
5
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series.腹腔镜与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:澳大利亚单中心单术者系列研究
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Mar;85(3):154-8. doi: 10.1111/ans.12602. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
6
Laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a case-control study at a single institution.腹腔镜与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术:单机构病例对照研究
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010 Jun;82(2):109-12.
7
Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术细节、肿瘤学及功能结果:400例患者,至少随访12个月
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1358-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.035. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
8
[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Review of our first year].
Arch Esp Urol. 2003 Apr;56(3):287-93.
9
Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助与纯腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结果比较。
Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):610-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.049. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
10
Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Siriraj Hospital.诗里拉吉医院的保留神经腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Apr;90(4):730-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate cancer in East Asia: evolving trend over the last decade.东亚地区的前列腺癌:过去十年的演变趋势
Asian J Androl. 2015 Jan-Feb;17(1):48-57. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.132780.
2
Radical perineal prostatectomy - the contemporary resurgence of a genuinely minimally invasive procedure: Procedure outline. Comparison of the advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of different surgical techniques of treating organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). A literature review with special focus on perineal prostatectomy.根治性会阴前列腺切除术——一种真正微创术式的当代复兴:手术概述。比较治疗局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的不同手术技术的优缺点及结果。一项特别关注会阴前列腺切除术的文献综述。
Cent European J Urol. 2012;65(4):188-94. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2012.04.art2. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
3
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological outcome analysis from a single-center Indian experience of 6 years.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:来自印度单中心6年经验的肿瘤学结果分析
Indian J Urol. 2012 Jan;28(1):32-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.94953.