Department of Microbiology, Porte de Hal Laboratory, Saint-Pierre University Hospital & Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;73(3):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 May 4.
The performance of 4 screening tests and 10 blot assays for the serologic diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis in a Belgian population was evaluated. A total of 196 sera were tested: 36 Lyme borreliosis at different stages of the disease, 50 healthy blood donors, and 110 representing various clinical circumstances. The DiaSorin Liaison and Euroimmun Anti-Borrelia screening tests were evaluated. The tested blot assays were Virotech Borrelia LINE tests WE222, WE225, and WE224, as well as Mikrogen recomLine Borrelia and Viramed ViraStripe. The specificity of IgG was acceptable for the different assays. For IgM, DiaSorin Liaison Borrelia IgM Quant, Mikrogen recomLine, and Viramed ViraStripe lacked specificity. Interestingly, a higher rate of falsely reactive samples was observed in the group of patients suffering from malaria. Serological diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis remains challenging; assays should be evaluated in the population where they are intended to be used.
评估了 4 种筛选试验和 10 种印迹检测法在比利时人群中对莱姆病血清学诊断的性能。共检测了 196 份血清:36 份处于疾病不同阶段的莱姆病、50 份健康献血者和 110 份代表各种临床情况的血清。评估了 DiaSorin Liaison 和 Euroimmun Anti-Borrelia 筛选试验。检测的印迹检测法是 Virotech Borrelia LINE 试验 WE222、WE225 和 WE224,以及 Mikrogen recomLine Borrelia 和 Viramed ViraStripe。不同检测法的 IgG 特异性可接受。对于 IgM,DiaSorin Liaison Borrelia IgM Quant、Mikrogen recomLine 和 Viramed ViraStripe 缺乏特异性。有趣的是,在患有疟疾的患者组中观察到假阳性样本的比率更高。莱姆病的血清学诊断仍然具有挑战性;应在拟使用的人群中评估检测法。