Suppr超能文献

正视眼和近视儿童的近工作诱导对比适应。

Near work-induced contrast adaptation in emmetropic and myopic children.

机构信息

Applied and Health Sciences Cluster, Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jun 5;53(7):3441-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8959.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Contrast adaptation may induce an error signal for emmetropization. This research aims to determine whether reading causes contrast adaptation in children and, if so, to determine whether myopes exhibit greater contrast adaptation than emmetropes.

METHODS

Baseline contrast sensitivity was determined in 34 emmetropic and 34 spectacle-corrected myopic children for 0.5, 1.2, 2.7, 4.4, and 6.2 cycles per degree (cpd) horizontal sine-wave gratings. Effects of near tasks on contrast sensitivity were determined during periods spent looking at a 6.2 cpd horizontal grating and during periods spent reading lines of English text, with 1.2 cpd row frequency and 6 cpd stroke frequency.

RESULTS

Both emmetropic and myopic groups (mean ± SD; age, 10.3 ± 1.4 years) showed reduced contrast sensitivity during both near tasks, with greatest overall adaptation at 6.2 cpd. Adaptation induced by viewing the grating (0.15 ± 0.17 log unit [40%]; range, 0.07-0.27 log unit) was significantly greater than adaptation induced by reading text (0.11 ± 0.18 log unit [29%], 0.08-0.16 log unit) (F(1,594) = 10.7; P = 0.001). Myopic children showed significantly greater adaptation across the tasks (0.15 ± 0.18 log unit [42%]) than emmetropic children (0.10 ± 0.16 log unit [26%]) (F(1,66) = 7.30; P = 0.009), with the greatest difference occurring at 4.4 cpd (mean, 0.11 log unit [30%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Grating and reading tasks induced contrast adaptation; viewing horizontal gratings induced greater adaptation than reading, and myopes exhibited greater adaptation than emmetropes. Contrast adaptation effects may underlie findings of prolonged near work being associated with myopia. However, our research does not show whether this is consequential or causal.

摘要

目的

对比敏感度适应可能会引发正视化的误差信号。本研究旨在确定阅读是否会引起儿童的对比敏感度适应,如果是这样,那么确定近视患者是否比正视患者表现出更大的对比敏感度适应。

方法

对 34 名正视和 34 名矫正近视的儿童进行基线对比敏感度测试,测试频率为 0.5、1.2、2.7、4.4 和 6.2 周/度(cpd)水平正弦光栅。在注视 6.2 cpd 水平光栅和阅读英文文字行期间,确定近任务对对比敏感度的影响,每行频率为 1.2 cpd,笔划频率为 6 cpd。

结果

两组(平均±标准差;年龄,10.3±1.4 岁)在近任务期间的对比敏感度均降低,6.2 cpd 时整体适应度最大。观看光栅引起的适应(0.15±0.17 对数单位[40%];范围,0.07-0.27 对数单位)明显大于阅读文本引起的适应(0.11±0.18 对数单位[29%],0.08-0.16 对数单位)(F(1,594)=10.7;P=0.001)。近视儿童在各项任务中的适应度明显高于正视儿童(0.15±0.18 对数单位[42%]),(0.10±0.16 对数单位[26%])(F(1,66)=7.30;P=0.009),最大差异出现在 4.4 cpd(平均,0.11 对数单位[30%])。

结论

光栅和阅读任务引起对比敏感度适应;与阅读相比,观看水平光栅引起的适应度更大,而近视患者的适应度大于正视患者。对比敏感度适应效应可能是近距离工作时间延长与近视有关的原因。然而,我们的研究并没有表明这是否具有因果关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验