• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多地点患者安全合作组织中预测医院安全氛围和能力变化的因素:一项纵向调查研究。

Factors predicting change in hospital safety climate and capability in a multi-site patient safety collaborative: a longitudinal survey study.

机构信息

Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):559-68. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000286. Epub 2012 May 5.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000286
PMID:22562874
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study had two specific objectives: (1) To analyse change in a survey measure of organisational patient safety climate and capability (SCC) resulting from participation in the UK Safer Patients Initiative and (2) To investigate the role of a range of programme and contextual factors in predicting change in SCC scores.

DESIGN

Single group longitudinal design with repeated measurement at 12-month follow-up.

SETTING

Multiple service areas within NHS hospital sites across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

PARTICIPANTS

Stratified sample of 284 respondents representing programme teams at 19 hospital sites.

INTERVENTION

A complex intervention comprising a multi-component quality improvement collaborative focused upon patient safety and designed to impact upon hospital leadership, communication, organisation and safety climate.

MEASURES

A survey including a 31-item SCC scale was administered at two time-points.

RESULTS

Modest but significant positive movement in SCC score was observed between the study time-points. Individual programme responsibility, availability of early adopters, multi-professional collaboration and extent of process measurement were significant predictors of change in SCC. Hospital type and size, along with a range of programme preconditions, were not found to be significant.

CONCLUSION

A range of social, cultural and organisational factors may be sensitive to this type of intervention but the measurable effect is small. Supporting critical local programme implementation factors may be an effective strategy in achieving development in organisational patient SCC, regardless of contextual factors and organisational preconditions.

摘要

目的

本研究有两个具体目标:(1)分析参与英国更安全患者倡议后,组织患者安全氛围和能力(SCC)调查衡量指标的变化;(2)研究一系列计划和背景因素在预测 SCC 评分变化中的作用。

设计

具有 12 个月随访的单次群组纵向设计,重复测量。

设置

英格兰、威尔士、苏格兰和北爱尔兰的 NHS 医院内多个服务领域。

参与者

来自 19 个医院计划团队的 284 名代表的分层样本。

干预措施

一项复杂的干预措施,包括一个多组成部分的质量改进合作,重点关注患者安全,并旨在影响医院领导、沟通、组织和安全氛围。

措施

在两个时间点进行了一项包括 31 个项目 SCC 量表的调查。

结果

在研究时间点之间观察到 SCC 评分适度但显著的积极变化。个体计划责任、早期采用者的可用性、多专业合作以及过程测量的程度是 SCC 变化的显著预测因素。医院类型和规模以及一系列计划前提条件并未被发现具有显著意义。

结论

一系列社会、文化和组织因素可能对这种类型的干预措施敏感,但可衡量的效果很小。支持关键的本地计划实施因素可能是实现组织患者 SCC 发展的有效策略,而不论背景因素和组织前提条件如何。

相似文献

1
Factors predicting change in hospital safety climate and capability in a multi-site patient safety collaborative: a longitudinal survey study.多地点患者安全合作组织中预测医院安全氛围和能力变化的因素:一项纵向调查研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):559-68. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000286. Epub 2012 May 5.
2
Association Between Implementing Comprehensive Learning Collaborative Strategies in a Statewide Collaborative and Changes in Hospital Safety Culture.在全州协作中实施全面学习协作策略与医院安全文化变化之间的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 1;155(10):934-940. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2842.
3
Perceptions of the impact of a large-scale collaborative improvement programme: experience in the UK Safer Patients Initiative.对一项大规模协作改进计划影响的认知:英国患者安全倡议的经验
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;15(3):524-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01145.x.
4
Patient safety climate and worker safety behaviours in acute hospitals in Scotland.苏格兰急性医院的患者安全氛围与员工安全行为。
J Safety Res. 2013 Jun;45:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
5
Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation.大规模组织干预以提高英国四家医院的患者安全:混合方法评估。
BMJ. 2011 Feb 3;342:d195. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d195.
6
Implementation of Releasing Time to Care - the productive ward.实施释放护理时间——高效病房。
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Jul;17(5):647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01026.x.
7
Building a safer foundation: the Lessons Learnt patient safety training programme.建立更安全的基础:经验教训患者安全培训计划。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan;23(1):78-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001740. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
8
Studying large-scale programmes to improve patient safety in whole care systems: challenges for research.研究改善整个医疗体系患者安全的大规模项目:研究面临的挑战。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(12):1767-76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.051. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
9
A leadership programme for critical care.重症监护领导力项目。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006 Aug;22(4):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2006.02.001. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
10
Predictors of the perceived impact of a patient safety collaborative: an exploratory study.预测患者安全合作的感知影响因素:一项探索性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Apr;23(2):173-81. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq089. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of interventions to improve safety culture on healthcare workers in hospital settings: a systematic review of the international literature.干预措施对改善医院环境中医疗工作者安全文化的效果:国际文献的系统评价。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 7;13(2):e002506. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002506.
2
Built to last? Barriers and facilitators of healthcare program sustainability: a systematic integrative review.经久不衰?医疗保健计划可持续性的障碍和促进因素:系统综合评价。
Implement Sci. 2023 Nov 13;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01315-x.
3
Organizational readiness to change as a leverage point for improving safety: a national nursing home survey.
组织变革准备度作为改善安全的杠杆点:一项全国性养老院调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 20;21(1):842. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06772-y.
4
How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review.质量改进合作如何以及在什么情况下能带来更好的结果?系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 May 4;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-0978-z.
5
Organisational context of hospitals that participated in a multi-site mentored medication reconciliation quality improvement project (MARQUIS2): a cross-sectional observational study.参与多地点辅导用药核对质量改进项目(MARQUIS2)的医院的组织背景:一项横断面观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e030834. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030834.
6
Organizational conditions for engagement in quality and safety improvement: a longitudinal qualitative study of community pharmacies.参与质量与安全改进的组织条件:社区药房的纵向定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 17;18(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3607-7.
7
Impacts of a navigation program based on health information technology for patients receiving oral anticancer therapy: the CAPRI randomized controlled trial.基于健康信息技术的导航计划对接受口服抗癌治疗患者的影响:CAPRI随机对照试验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 13;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2066-x.
8
Best practice strategies to safeguard drug prescribing and drug administration: an anthology of expert views and opinions.保障药物处方和给药的最佳实践策略:专家观点与意见选集
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Apr;38(2):362-73. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0253-1. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
9
How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types.如何研究改善干预措施:可能的研究类型简要概述。
Postgrad Med J. 2015 Jun;91(1076):343-54. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-003620rep.
10
How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types.如何研究改善干预措施:可能的研究类型简要概述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May;24(5):325-36. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003620. Epub 2015 Mar 25.