Suppr超能文献

国际研究中的个体风险与群体获益。

Individual risk and community benefit in international research.

机构信息

Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, 10 Center Drive, Bldg. 10 room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892-1156, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2012 Oct;38(10):626-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100171. Epub 2012 May 5.

Abstract

It is widely agreed that medical researchers who conduct studies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are morally required to ensure that their research benefits the broader host community, not only the subjects. The justification for this moral requirement has not been adequately examined. Most attempts to justify this requirement focus on researchers' interaction with the community as a whole, not on their relationship with their subjects. This paper argues that in some cases, research must benefit the broader host community for researchers to treat subjects and prospective subjects ethically. If research presents substantial net risks to subjects, researchers can ethically ask LMIC citizens to participate only if people in LMICs, normally including people in the host community, stand to benefit.

摘要

人们普遍认为,在中低收入国家(LMICs)进行研究的医学研究人员在道德上有责任确保他们的研究使更广泛的东道社区受益,而不仅仅是研究对象。这一道德要求的理由尚未得到充分审查。大多数试图证明这一要求合理性的尝试都集中在研究人员与整个社区的互动上,而不是他们与研究对象的关系上。本文认为,在某些情况下,研究必须使更广泛的东道社区受益,研究人员才能在道德上对待研究对象和潜在研究对象。如果研究对研究对象造成实质性的净风险,那么只有在 LMIC 公民,通常包括东道社区的人,有可能受益的情况下,研究人员才能在道德上要求他们参与研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验